UPDATE: we have a report that the former shrink has been sentenced for his misconduct:
A former Launceston psychiatrist has been sentenced to 18 months jail for hiring a former patient to intimidate another patient.Original Report: As seen in these reports from ABC News in Australia
A criminal court jury this afternoon found Ian Anthony Martin guilty of attempting to interfere with a witness.
The Chief Justice Peter Underwood says the crime struck at the well being of society and the court must send a clear message that it will act to protect the judicial system.
He gave Martin a 10 month non parole period.
Report 1
The trial of a Launceston psychiatrist, accused of trying to use one patient to threaten another, will continue in the Launceston Criminal Court tomorrow.Report 2
Ian Anthony Martin has pleaded not guilty to attempting to interfere with a witness and to an alternative charge of perverting the course of justice.
Martin has denied that in 1998 he asked a female patient to withdraw a charge against him of maintaining a sexual relationship.
Another former patient, Gregory Shane Kirkland, has told the court that he damaged the woman's car after Martin asked him to threaten her and her family.
A third former patient, Raymond Henry Wells, said he helped Martin burn the woman's medical files.
Tomorrow the jury will continue watching a recorded police interview with Martin, before the Crown sums up its case.
A man has told the Launceston Criminal Court how his doctor asked him to threaten a Launceston family in 1998.
The witness was a patient of Launceston psychiatrist Ian Anthony Martin.
Martin has pleaded not guilty to one count of interfering with a witness and an alternative count of perverting the course of justice.
This morning witness Gregory Shane Kirkland told the court that his psychiatrist Martin offered him $1,000 to go to a Launceston house and threaten a family to get them to drop a lawsuit against Martin.
Mr Kirkland said he damaged two cars at the house and made a threatening phone call.
Martin's lawyer Adrian Hall asked Mr Kirkland whether he had made the story up to get back at Martin for writing a report that resulted in the witness losing his son to child protection.
Mr Kirkland rejected the suggestion.
The trial is continuing.
No comments:
Post a Comment