Monday, November 17, 2014

U.S. Psychology Licensing Boards by State (Updated Listing)

Here is a list of Psychology Licensing Boards in the USA, given Alphabetically by State
  
This is contact information for state and territorial agencies responsible for the licensing and certification of psychologists throughout the U.S. listed in alphabetical order below

Please note that while we think this information is correct, that names and telephone numbers may have changed. This information may be useful if you want to file a complaint against your local psychologist.

ALABAMA
Alabama Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Address
660 Adams Ave.
Suite 360
Montgomery, Alabama 36104
Phone 

(334) 242-4127
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


ALASKA
Alaska Board of Psychologists & Psychological Associate Examiners
Address
P. O. Box 110806

Juneau, Alaska 99811-0806
Phone 
(907) 465-5470
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


ARIZONA
Arizona Board of Psychologists Examiners
Address
1400 West Washington Street, Suite 240

Phoenix, Arizona 85007
Phone 
(602) 542-8162
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


ARKANSAS
Arkansas Board of Examiners in Psychology
Address
101 East Capitol, Suite 415

Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Phone 
(501) 682-6167
Main Page
Verify a License
Law




CALIFORNIA 
California Board of Psychology
Address
1625 North Market Blvd.
Suite N-215

Sacramento, California 95834
Phone 
(916) 574-7720
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


COLORADO
Colorado Board of Psychologists Examiners
Address
1560 Broadway, Suite 1350

Denver, Colorado 80202

Phone 
(303) 894-7768
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


CONNECTICUT
Connecticut Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Address
410 Capitol Ave. MS#12APP
P. O. Box 340308

Hartford, Connecticut 06134-8376
Phone 
(860) 509-8376
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


DELAWARE
Delaware Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Address
Cannon Building, Suite 203
861 Silver Lake Blvd.

Dover, Delaware 19904
Phone 
(302) 744-4534
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
District of Columbia Board of Psychology
Address
899 North Capitol Street, NESuite 200

Washington, District of Columbia 20002
Phone 
(202) 724-4900
Main Page
Verify a License
Rules & Regulations


FLORIDA 
Florida Board of Psychology
Address
4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin CO5

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3255
Phone 
(850) 488-0595
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


GEORGIA
Georgia Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Address
237 Coliseum Drive

Macon, Georgia 31217
Phone 
(478) 207-2440 
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


GUAM
Guam Board of Allied Health Examiners
Address
651 Legacy Square Commercial Complex S.
Rte. 10, Suite 9
Mangilao, Guam 96913

Phone 

(617) 735-7407
Main Page
Verify a License


HAWAII
Hawaii Board of Psychology
Address
PO Box 3469

Honolulu, Hawaii 96801
Phone 
(808) 586-2699
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


IDAHO
Idaho Board of Psychological Examiners
Address
P. O. Box 83720

Boise, Idaho 83720-0063
Phone 
(208) 334-3233
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


ILLINOIS
Illinois Psychologists Licensing Board
Address
Dept of Financial & Professional Regulation
320 W Washington Street, 3rd Floor

Springfield, Illinois 62786
Phone 
(217) 785-0800
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


INDIANA
Indiana State Psychology Board
Address
402 W Washington St., Room W072

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
Phone (317) 232-2960
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


IOWA
Iowa Board of Psychology
Address
321 East 12th Street
Lucas State Office Bldg, 5th Floor

Des Moines, Iowa 50319-0075
Phone 
(515) 281-6352
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


KANSAS

Kansas Behavioral Sciences Regulatory Board
Address
700 SW Harrison Suite 420

Topeka, Kansas 66603
Phone 
(785) 296-3240
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


KENTUCKY
Kentucky State Board of Psychology
Address
P.O Box 1360

Frankfort, Kentucky 40602
Phone 
(502) 564-3296
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


LOUISIANA
Louisiana Board of Psychologist Examiners
Address
8706 Jefferson Highway Suite B

Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809
Phone 
(225) 925-6511
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


MAINE
Maine Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Address
35 State House Station

Augusta, Maine 04333
Phone 
(207) 624-8621
Main Page
Verify a License
Law



MARYLAND
Maryland Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Address
4201 Patterson Avenue

Baltimore, Maryland 21215
Phone (410) 764-4787
Main Page
Verify a License
Law
Rules & Regulations


MASSACHUSETTS
Massachusetts Board of Registration of Psychologists
Address
Div. of Professional Licensure
1000 Washington Street, Ste 710

Boston, Massachusetts 02118
Phone 
(617) 727-0592
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


MICHIGAN
Michigan Board of Psychology
Address
Bureau of Health Professions-Board of Psychology
P.O. Box 30670

Lansing, Michigan 48909
Phone 
(517) 335-0918
Main Page
Verify a License


MINNESOTA
Minnesota Board of Psychology
Address
2829 University Ave. SE, Ste 320

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414
Phone 
(612) 617-2230
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


MISSISSIPPI
Mississippi Board of Psychology
Address
2395 Deerfield Road

Yazoo City, Mississippi 39194
Phone 
(888) 693-1416
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


MISSOURI
Missouri State Committee of Psychologists
Address
P.O. Box 1335
3605 Missouri Blvd.

Jefferson City, Missouri 65102
Phone 
(573) 751-0099
Main Page
Verify a License
Law



MONTANA
Montana Board of Psychologists
Address
301 S. Park Avenue, 4th FloorP.O. Box 200513

Helena, Montana 59620
Phone 
(406) 841-2394
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


NEBRASKA
Nebraska Board of Psychologists
Address
P.O. Box 94986

Lincoln, Nebraska, 68509-4986
Phone 
(402) 471-2117
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


NEVADA
Nevada Board of Psychological Examiners
Address
4600 Kietzke Lane
Bldg. E-141

Reno, Nevada 89502
Phone 
(775) 688-1268
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


NEW HAMPSHIRE
New Hampshire Board of Psychology
Address
121 South Fruit Street

Concord, New Hampshire 03301
Phone 
(603) 271-9369
Main Page
Verify a License


NEW JERSEY
New Jersey Board of Psychological Examiners
Address
P.O. Box 45017

Newark, New Jersey 07101
Phone 
(973) 504-6305
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


NEW MEXICO
New Mexico Board of Psychologist Examiners
Address
P O Box 25101

Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504
Phone 
(505) 476-4611
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


NEW YORK
New York State Board of Psychology
Address
NYS Education Department
89 Washington Avenue

Albany, New York 12234
Phone 
(518) 474-3817
Main Page
Verify a License
Law



NORTH CAROLINA
North Carolina Psychology Board
Address
895 State Farm Road, Ste 101

Boone, North Carolina 28607
Phone 
(828) 262-2258
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota Board of Psychologist Examiners
Address
P.O. Box 7042

Bismarck, North Dakota 58507
Phone 
(701) 590-1754
Main Page
Verify a License


OHIOOhio State Board of Psychology
Address
77 S. High Street, Suite 1830

Columbus, Ohio 43215-6108
Phone 
(614) 466-8808
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma State Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Address
421 NW 13th Street
Suite 180
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73103

Phone 
(405) 524-9094
Main Page
Verify a License
Law



OREGON
Oregon State Board of Psychologist Examiners
Address
3218 Pringle Road SE, Suite 130

Salem, Oregon 97302-6309
Phone 
(503) 378-4154
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


PENNSYLVANIA
Pennsylvania State Board of Psychology
Address
P.O. Box 2649

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105-2649
Phone 
(717) 783-4856
Main Page
Verify a License


PUERTO RICO
Puerto Rico Board of Psychologist Examiners
Address
P. O. Box 10200

Santurce, Puerto Rico 00908-0200
Phone 
(787) 723-2885
Verify a License

RHODE ISLAND
Rhode Island Board of Psychology
Address
3 Capital Hill, Room 104

Providence, Rhode Island 02908
Phone 
(401) 222-2828
Main Page
Verify a License


SOUTH CAROLINA
South Carolina Board of Examiners in Psychology
Address
P. O. Box 11329

Columbia, South Carolina 29211-1329
Phone 
(803) 896-4664
Main Page
Verify a License


SOUTH DAKOTA
 South Dakota Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Address
810 N. Main St. #298
Spearfish, South Dakota 57783
Phone(605) 642-1600
Main Page
Verify a License
Law
Rules & Regulations

TENNESSEE
Tennessee Board of Examiners of Psychology

Address
665 Mainstream Drive
2nd Floor

Nashville, Tennessee 37243 
Phone 
(615) 532-3202
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


TEXAS
Texas Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Address
333 Guadalupe, Tower 2, Room 450

Austin, Texas 78701
Phone 
(512) 305-7700
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


UTAH
Utah Psychology Licensing Board
Address
Div. of Occup. & Prof Licensing
160 East 300 South, 1st Floor Lobby

Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Phone 
(801) 530-6621
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


VERMONT
Vermont Board of Psychological Examiners
Address
89 Main Street3rd Floor

Montpelier, Vermont 05620
Phone 
(802) 828-2373
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


VIRGIN ISLANDS
Virgin Islands Board of Psychology Examiners
Address
Office of the Commissioner
Roy O. Schneider Hospital, 9048 Sugar Estate Street

St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 00802
Phone 
(340) 776-8311
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


VIRGINIA 
Virginia Board of Psychology
Address
9960 Maryland Dr., Suite 300

Henrico, Virginia 23233-1463
Phone 
(804) 367-4697
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


WASHINGTON
Washington State Examining Board of Psychology
Address
P. O. Box 47877

Olympia, Washington 98507
Phone 
(360) 236-4912
Main Page
Verify a License


WEST VIRGINIA
West Virginia Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Address
P. O. Box 3955

Charleston, West Virginia 25339
Phone 
(304) 558-0604
Main Page
Verify a License
Law


WISCONSIN
Wisconsin Psychology Examining Board
Address
P. O. Box 8935

Madison, Wisconsin 53708
Phone 
(608) 266-2112
Main Page
Verify a License


WYOMING
Wyoming Board of Psychology
Address
Emerson Building Room 104
2001 Capitol Avenue

Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002
Phone 
(307) 777-3507
Main Page
Verify a License
Law

Sunday, November 16, 2014

Saturday, November 15, 2014

While recovering from the effects of rape and abuse, her psychiatrist told her that her ambitions were 'delusions of grandeur". Meaghan Buisson went on to set a world record in her sport.

An incredibly brave Meaghan Buisson details her path to recovery from the effects of modern psychiatry.

Here are some snippets from a fascinating and extended article.

I was 10 months shy of graduating from veterinary medicine when I slashed my wrist, swallowed every pill I could find and dropped out of school.

This lead to weekly sessions with a man I’d soon come to loathe. He was head of the Department of Psychiatry. I wasn’t sure who I was anymore. Until then, I’d been the diligent daughter. The gifted student. The token girl friend. The coach’s pet. A hollow shell of nothingness, I was everything to everyone, and no one to myself.

A few months earlier, I’d been raped.

But that was never discussed. Nor were six years of preceding sexual abuse, let alone any other details of childhood trauma. Determined to figure out what was wrong with me, no one thought to ask what had happened to me. Flinching at my own shadow, quite literally too scared to speak, nor was I about to volunteer.

Our appointments were warfare, played out over drugs. I took a red pen to my medical file and corrected his spelling He promptly diagnosed me as oppositionally defiant and hid his notes. Shaking his head, he asked “now that you’ve dropped out of a medical program, WHAT do you intend to do with your life?!”

At my response, his pen hanged itself from his fingers then frantically started kicking ink across the page. Tearing one script after another off a thick stack of forms, he thrust them towards me, exclaiming I was clearly psychotic and would require lifelong treatment to control my manic “delusions of grandeur.”

The delusion in question?

I told him I wanted to become a world champion inline speed skater.


[...]

Every time I tried to fight, I was told my refusal to accept my diagnoses was itself proof of mental illness and further indication I needed to be drugged. So that’s what they did.

Under an ever-increasing fog, I tried to gather my life. But no matter how hard I tried, I just couldn’t do it. My doctors said there was nothing fundamentally wrong with me. They refused to sign the paperwork that would have provided temporary medical relief from student loans, insisting my state was a choice and I just “needed to get a job” and “grow up.” My family said the same.

[...] When I came off medication, I didn’t have any support. My psychiatrist and general physician both said it would kill me – not from suicide, simply the toxicity flowing through my veins. “I’d rather be dead,” I replied, “than spend even one more day living like I already am.” So I fired them both and flushed everything down the toilet.

At the time, I was taking Risperdal, Lamictal, Zoloft, Paxil, Effexor, Valproate, Ativan and Prozac. All simultaneously, with three (at doctors’ orders) well beyond what I later learned were maximal recommended dosages. Previously, I’d also been on Lithium and Wellbutrin. I don’t remember most of the year or so that followed. From what I’ve been told, in terms of the psychotic breaks and other withdrawal challenges, it was hell. But if I had to, I’d do it again in a heartbeat.

Coming off meds was the single best decision I’ve ever made.

That said, it hasn’t been easy.
Meaghan Buisson has since gone on to set a world record in inline speed skating solo-marathon world record. She is a world class champion inline speed skater.

A former Fogelsville (Pennsylvania) psychiatrist who failed to show up for sentencing this week in his pill-mill case was found dead Thursday afternoon.

From a longer report in the Morning Call

Dr. David Daley, 59, was found along the Susquehanna River just east of the Maynard Street Bridge in Williamsport, Lycoming County Coroner Chuck Kiessling said.

"It appears to be a self-inflicted gunshot wound," Kiessling said. He ruled the death a suicide.

Daley was facing the possibility of more than 20 years in a state prison for breaking prescription medication laws and providing drug addicts with easy access to painkillers.

His attorney, Kathryn Roberts, said his family was distraught over the news.

Police had searched for Daley on Wednesday night and Thursday morning. They said he was emotionally unstable and had a revolver. "This is just a tragedy for his family," Roberts said.

[...]

A jury Sept. 26 found Daley guilty of 16 drug-related charges. State sentencing guidelines called for a sentence of 22 to 36 months for most of those counts. Ford could have sentenced Daley separately for each, or run them concurrently, allowing Daley to serve them all at the same time.

[...]

Roberts said she did not know where Daley got the gun. As far as she and his family knew, he did not own a firearm, she said.

During the two-week trial, state Deputy Attorney General Christie Bonesch presented witnesses who said Daley gave them prescriptions without performing physical exams or taking a medical history. In one 11-day period, the prosecutor told the jury, Daley prescribed one patient 1,320 oxycodone pills and 500 tablets of the anti-anxiety drug Xanax.

[...]

Daley was arrested in January 2013 on a recommendation from a statewide grand jury that heard testimony in 2010 and 2011. Prosecutors from the state attorney general's office said the crimes occurred between Jan. 1, 2008, and Dec. 17, 2009, when Daley had a home office at 7729 Main St., Fogelsville.

Daley was initially charged with crimes related to 28 patients. Prosecutors withdrew counts related to 12 patients during the trial, and Daley was convicted on all charges related to the remaining 16.

[...]

Friday, November 14, 2014

A landmark study indicates that seven pesticides, some widely used, may be causing clinical depression in farmers.

A NIH study finds that: There’s a significant correlation between pesticide use and depression, that much is very clear, but not all pesticides. The two types that Kamel says reliably moved the needle on depression are organochlorine insecticides and fumigants, which increase the farmer’s risk of depression by a whopping 90% and 80%, respectively.

As seen in this report from Modern Farmer Magazine

(Read the full article at the link)

Earlier this fall, researchers from the National Institute of Health finished up a landmark 20-year study, a study that hasn’t received the amount of coverage it deserves. About 84,000 farmers and spouses of farmers were interviewed since the mid-1990s to investigate the connection between pesticides and depression, a connection that had been suggested through anecdotal evidence for far longer. We called up Dr. Freya Kamel, the lead researcher on the study, to find out what the team learned and what it all means. Spoiler: nothing good.

“There had been scattered reports in the literature that pesticides were associated with depression,” says Kamel. “We wanted to do a new study because we had more detailed data than most people have access to.” That excessive amount of data includes tens of thousands of farmers, with specific information about which pesticides they were using and whether they had sought treatment for a variety of health problems, from pesticide poisoning to depression. Farmers were surveyed multiple times throughout the 20-year period, which gives the researchers an insight into their health over time that no other study has.

Because the data is so excessive, the researchers have mined it three times so far, the most recent time in a study published just this fall. The first one was concerned with suicide, the second with depression amongst the spouses of farmers (Kamel says “pesticide applicators,” but most of the people applying pesticides are farmers), and the most recent with depression amongst the farmers themselves.

There’s a significant correlation between pesticide use and depression, that much is very clear, but not all pesticides. The two types that Kamel says reliably moved the needle on depression are organochlorine insecticides and fumigants, which increase the farmer’s risk of depression by a whopping 90% and 80%, respectively. The study lays out the seven specific pesticides, falling generally into one of those two categories, that demonstrated a categorically reliable correlation to increased risk of depression.

These types aren’t necessarily uncommon, either; one, called malathion, was used by 67% of the tens of thousands of farmers surveyed. Malathion is banned in Europe, for what that’s worth.

[...]

The study doesn’t really deal with exactly how the pesticides are affecting the farmers. Insecticides are designed to disrupt the way nerves work, sometimes inhibiting specific enzymes or the way nerve membranes work, that kind of thing. It’s pretty complicated, and nobody’s quite sure where depression fits in. “How this ultimately leads to depression, I don’t know that anyone can really fill in the dots there,” says Kamel. But essentially, the pesticides are designed to mess with the nerves of insects, and in certain aspects, our own nervous systems are similar enough to those of insects that we could be affected, too. “I don’t think there’s anything surprising about the fact that pesticides would affect neurologic function,” says Kamel, flatly.

[...]

Of course, the knee-jerk reaction to fix the situation is to give the farmers more psych drugs. Nope.

The sham drug idea of the year: 'pink Viagra'

Snippet from from an Op-Ed featured in the LA Times by Ellen Laan and Leonore Tiefer

Ellen Laan is an associate professor of sexology at the University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and a Kinsey Institute research fellow. Leonore Tiefer is a clinical associate professor of psychiatry at NYU School of Medicine and founder of the New View Campaign

Many women report losing their desire for sex, some temporarily, some permanently. Is this a relationship problem, a normal aspect of life changes or, as the pharmaceutical industry maintains, an “unmet medical need”? That was the question under consideration for two days of meetings in late October, during which the Food and Drug Administration heard from sexual medicine experts and women with sexual complaints.

It was a rowdy meeting by sedate, scientific standards, and months of public relations campaigning had preceded it. The International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health, which is largely funded by the pharmaceutical industry, had joined with Sprout Pharmaceuticals and other companies with skin in the game to develop two slick campaigns, “eventhescore.org” and “womendeserve.org,” which argued that the FDA's failure to approve a drug to treat women's sexual problems was “sexist.” After all, men have Viagra and its various relatives.

The patients told stories of their frustrations and distress, but they appeared to have been coached to demand drug solutions. They acknowledged that their travel expenses to the meeting had been paid. Wearing matching green scarves and buttons proclaiming “#WomenDeserve,” the women described the mixed results and side effects of their various off-label treatments, including implanted testosterone pellets, testosterone gels and antidepressants. They insisted they had no nonmedical problems. Their desire had simply “turned off like a light switch,” as one woman said, sometimes as much as 30 years earlier, and they wanted it back, routine and predictable.

As professional sexologists and advocates of women's sexual rights, we were horrified by the campaigns' use and abuse of the language of equality to pressure the FDA to approve a potential billion-dollar blockbuster “pink Viagra.”

The only two drugs for women's sexual dysfunctions that have come to the FDA in the 16 years since Viagra was approved were rejected. One was Sprout's drug, flibanserin, then owned by a German company. The drugs for women didn't work and were unsafe. Not approving them isn't sexism, it's proper regulation.

The campaigns to “even the score” are deceptive for several reasons.

[...]

There is absolutely no evidence for womendeserve.org's claim that “a biological lack of desire to have sex negatively impacts 1 in 10 American women.”

No diagnostic test has identified any biological cause — brain, hormone, genital blood flow — for most women's sexual problems. On the contrary, abundant evidence shows that low sexual desire in women typically reflects a difference in desire between two partners. It is unethical and unscientific to attribute a couple's discrepancy in desire to the woman's biological deficit. In study after study, women's response to both test medications and placebo drugs is high. These repeated findings do not support the “unmet medical need” theory.
Emphasis added by this blogger.

Be sure to read the full Op-ED at this link

Big Pharma Plays Hide-the-Ball With Data

NewsWeek has a Story featured on their front cover about how "Big Pharma Plays Hide-the-Ball With Data"



The story is focused on the general and universal problem of publication bias.

Naturally the problem is also a major issue for psych drug manufacturers.

It is much too long to quote in full but we can feature some highlights here.
On the morning of March 2, 2005, a 14-year-old Japanese girl woke up scared. At first she thought someone was outside the house watching her, but then she decided the stranger must be inside. She wandered restlessly and, despite the cold weather, threw open all the windows. Later, over a meal, she declared, “The salad is poisoned.” Two days later, she said she wanted to kill herself.

This teenager with no history of mental illness was diagnosed with delirium. The night before the hallucinations started, she began taking an anti-influenza drug called Tamiflu (generic name: oseltamivir), which governments around the world have spent billions stockpiling for the next major flu outbreak.

But evidence released earlier this year by Cochrane Collaboration, a London-based nonprofit, shows that a significant amount of negative data from the drug’s clinical trials were hidden from the public. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) knew about it, but the medical community did not; the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which doesn’t have the same access to unpublished data as regulators, had recommended the drug without being able to see the full picture. When results from those unpublished trials finally did emerge, they cast doubt over whether Tamiflu is as effective as the manufacturer says.



Knowing about negative results is not just useful; it is essential to good science. Randomized clinical trials are considered the best way to test a drug: Get two groups of patients with the same problem, give one group an experimental treatment and see if it works better than no treatment. Even better, amass the results of dozens of similar clinical trials, level the differences and draw better conclusions from a larger amount of data. That’s called a systematic review.

Problem is, a systematic review only works if the reviewers have all the information—good, bad and inconclusive.

“In baseball, it is easy to find out just how well Cal Ripken has hit against various pitchers in the past, at home or away games, in recent weeks or during his career,” Dickersin and Rennie wrote. “Yet in medicine, there is no comprehensive source for finding out similar, accurate statistics for medical interventions. How can baseball be better organized and keep better records than medical science?”

One reason is that drug companies have so much to lose. “The potential economic implications of publishing an unfavorable study are really significant for pharmaceutical companies,” says Christopher W. Jones, who studies publication bias at Cooper Medical School of Rowan University. “And clearly those incentives have an effect on the way they choose to present their data to the public.”



Publication bias in clinical trials was, for a long time, something only scientists cared about. But lately the issue has raised a crop of lobbyists and gone mainstream. In 2005, John P.A. Ioannidis, a researcher at the Stanford School of Medicine, published a scientific paper under the provocative heading “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False” and mentioned publication bias. And British doctor Ben Goldacre leads a movement called AllTrials. His TED talk on publication bias has been seen 1.8 million times.

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Medical Licensing Boards in Canada: Information on filing complaints against psychiatrists in Canada

Here is a list of Medical Licensing Boards in the Canada, given alphabetically by Province. This information may be useful if you want to file a complaint against your local psychiatrist.

This is contact information for provincial agencies in Canada responsible for the licensure and certification of psychiatrists throughout Canada listed in alphabetical order below. Other additional links and information are provided.

Please note that while we think this information is correct, that names, telephone numbers, and other information may have changed.

As found at this webpage on the website of the Canadian Psychiatric Association




I want to make a complaint about my psychiatrist's conduct. Who should I contact? Contact your provincial College of Physicians and Surgeons or Medical Board for further information on the complaints process governing physicians in your province. Complaints must usually be made in writing. The following is a brief description of how to lodge a complaint, the contact information for the appropriate body and the link to further electronic information.

To lodge a complaint in Alberta, mail in a completed, signed Complaint Reporting Form or letter of complaint to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta. The contact information for the Alberta College is:

College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta
2700 - 10020 100 Street NW
Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 0N3
Phone: 780-423-4764
Fax: 780-420-0651
General Public Inquires: 1-800-561-3899
Complaints Line: 1-800-661-4689 (in Alberta)
College Patient Advocate: 780-423-4764 or 1-800-661-4689
For more information on the complaints process in Alberta click here.

In British Columbia, complete a complaint form or write a letter including your name, date of birth, address and telephone number, the name and address of the doctor involved, a description of the incident in as much detail as possible, the date of the incident and your signature. Complaints are not accepted by e-mail and they must be signed and submitted in writing either by mail or fax. Send complaints to:

The Registrar
College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia
400-585 Beatty St.
Vancouver BC V6B 1C1
For more information on the complaints process in British Columbia click here.

In Manitoba, complaints must be made in writing and signed. A letter to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Manitoba should include your name, address, telephone number(s), Personal Health Identification Number (from your Manitoba Health card), the name of physician(s) being complained about, the date(s) of service, the name and address of other caregivers from whom information should be obtained (for example, other physicians, nurses, physiotherapists or dentists), the name of hospital(s), dates seen, and a clear description of the complaint about the physician(s). Mail or fax your letter to:

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Manitoba
Attn: The Complaints Department
1000-1661 Portage Avenue
Winnipeg, Manitoba R3J 3T7
Fax: 204-774-0750
For more information, click here.

In New Brunswick, complaints must be submitted in writing to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of New Brunswick. Mail or fax your complaint to:

Registrar
c/o College of Physicians and Surgeons of New Brunswick
1 Hampton St, Suite 300
Rothesay, NB E2E 5K8
Tel: (506) 849-5050 ou 1-800-667-4641
Fax: (506) 849-5069
For more complete information on the complaints process, click here.

In Newfoundland, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Newfoundland and Labrador accept complaints in writing. Letters of complaint should be sent to:

College of Physicians and Surgeons of Newfoundland and Labrador
139 Water Street, Suite 603
Saint John's, NF A1C 1B2
Tel: 709-726-8546
1-800-563-8546 (Toll Free from outside St. John's)
Fax: 709-726-4725
For more information on the complaints process in Newfoundland and Labrador click here.

The President of the Medical Board of Inquiry is responsible for investigating written complaints about physicians in the Northwest Territories and can be contacted at:

President of the Medical Board of Inquiry
2025 Palermo Way SW
Calgary AB T2V 5J6
Phone: (403) 281-7122
Fax: (403) 281-7124

In Nova Scotia, complaints must be made in writing. Complaint forms are available on the College website. Although the form is recommended, you may file a complaint without using the form provided your letter is typed or legibly written and signed. A signed consent form is also required before the complaint can be investigated. The complaint should contain the doctor's name, a description of the events that led to the complaint (such as the date and location) and any other information that may aid the College in its investigation. You may wish to add the names of people who witnessed the events or who have useful information. The College contact information is:

Investigations Department
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia
Suite 5005 - 7071 Bayers Road
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3L 2C2
Tel: 902-422-5823 or Toll-free in Nova Scotia 1 877-282-7767
Investigations Department Fax: 902-422-5271
For more information on the complaints procedure, click here.

To obtain information about the complaints process in Nunavut, contact the
Department of Health and Social Services at:

Government of Nunavut
Registrar, Professional Licensing
2nd Floor, NCC Building
Box 390
Kugluktuk NU X0B 0E0
Telephone: 867-982-7672
Fax: 867-982-3256 or 867-982-7640
E-mail: bvandenassem@gov.nu.ca

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario accepts complaints either in writing or in other permanent form (such as a tape, film or disk). Complaints may be e-mailed to the College but confidentiality cannot be guaranteed when using this method. All correspondence sent from the College in response to an e-mail complaint will be sent by regular mail to preserve confidentiality. The College's web site also offers an online complaint form. The contact information for the College is:

The Registrar
c/o Investigations and Resolutions Department
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario
80 College Street
Toronto, Ontario M5G 2E2
Tel: 416-967-2603 or 1-800-268-7096 ext. 603.
E-mail: investigations&resolutions@cpso.on.ca
For more information on the complaints process in Ontario click here.

To initiate a complaint in Prince Edward Island you must submit a letter detailing the complaint to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of PEI and send it to:

College of Physicians and Surgeons of PEI
199 Grafton Street
Charlottetown, PE C1A 1L2
Fax: 902-566-3986
For further information on the complaints process click here.

In Quebec, you can request an investigation into the professional conduct of your physician by completing and sending a investigation request form to the Direction des enquêtes du Collège des médecins du Québec:

Direction des enquêtes
Collège des médecins du Québec
2170, boulevard René Levesque Ouest
Montréal (Québec) H3H 2T8
Fax: 514-933-2291
Tel: 514-933-4441 Toll free (from outside Montreal): 1-888-MÉDECIN
For more detailed information on complaints procedures click here.

In Saskatchewan, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan accepts complaints in writing. A complaint reporting form is available online. The contact information for the College is:

College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan
500-321A-21st Street East
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 0C1
1-800-667-1668 (Complaints Toll Free Number)
Fax: 306-244-0090 (general) or 306-244-2600 (Registrar)
For more information on the complaints process in Saskatchewan click here.

In the Yukon, letters of complaint must be made in writing and accompanied by a Consent to Release Information form. Complaints should be directed to:

Yukon Medical Council
c/o Registrar of Medical Practitioners
Box 2703 C-18
Whitehorse YT Y1A 2C6
Telephone: 867-667-3774
Fax: 867-393-6483

More information on the complaints process is available on the Yukon Medical Council website.

Canadian Psychology Licensing Boards by Province (late 2014)

Here is a list of Psychology Licensing Boards in the Canada, given Alphabetically by Province 

This is contact information for provincial agencies in Canada responsible for the licensure and certification of psychologists throughout Canada listed in alphabetical order below. Other additional links are provided.

Please note that while we think this information is correct, that names and telephone numbers may have changed. This information may be useful if you want to file a complaint against your local psychologist. 

ALBERTA
The College of Alberta Psychologists
Address
2100 Sunlife Place
10123 - 99th Street

Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3H1
Phone 
(780) 424-5070
Main Page
Verify a License
Law

BRITISH COLUMBIA
College of Psychologists of British Columbia
Address
404 - 1755 W Broadway
Vancouver, British Columbia V6J 4S5
Phone 
(604) 736-6164
Main Page
Verify a License
Law

MANITOBA
Psychological Association of Manitoba
Address
162-2025 Corydon Ave., #253
Winnipeg, Manitoba R3P 0N5
Phone 
(204) 487-0784
Main Page
Verify a License
Law

NEW BRUNSWICK
College of Psychologists of New Brunswick
Address
236 St. George Street
Suite 219
Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 1W1
Phone 
(506) 382-1994
Main Page
Verify a License

NEWFOUNDLAND & LABRADOR
Newfoundland & Labrador Psychology Board
Address
NLPB, Suite 303, Carnell Building
P. O. Box 8275
St. John's, Newfoundland & Labrador A1B 3N4
Phone 
(709) 579-6313
Main Page
Verify a License

NOVA SCOTIA
Nova Scotia Board of Examiners in Psychology
Address
The Halifax Professional Centre
455 - 5991 Spring Garden Road
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 1Y6
Phone 
(902) 423-2238
Main Page
Verify a License
Law

ONTARIO
College of Psychologists of Ontario
Address
110 Eglinton Avenue West, Suite 500
Toronto, Ontario M4R 1A3
Phone 
(416) 961-8817
Main Page
Verify a License

PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
Prince Edward Island Psychologists Regulation Board
Address
Univ. of Prince Edward Island, Psych. Dept.
550 University Avenue
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island C1A 4P3
Phone 
(902) 566-0549
Main Page
Verify a License
Law

QUEBEC
Ordre des psychologists du Quebec
Address
1100 Beaumont AvenueSuite 510
Mount Royal, Quebec H3P 3H5
Phone 
(514) 738-1881
Main Page
Verify a License

SASKATCHEWAN
Saskatchewan College of Psychologists
Address
1026 Winnipeg Street
Regina, Saskatchewan S4R 8P8
Phone 
(306) 352-1699
Main Page
Verify a License


Unforgotten: Twenty-Five Years After Willowbrook

"Unforgotten" is a critically acclaimed, award-winning documentary that examines the impact of the horrors of Willowbrook on the survivors and their families, 25 years after Geraldo Rivera's historic television exposé.

It was a nightmare that shocked not only New York, but all of America. The public outcry about the Willowbrook State School for people with developmental disabilities resulted from Geraldo Rivera's exposé on WABC after he had entered Willowbrook with a film crew in 1972, using a stolen key.
Geraldo Rivera discusses what he found in Willibrook



Geraldo Rivera speaks on what it was like to make the investigative report (Parts 1 and 2 in particular)

Part One



Part Two



Part Three

NY lawmakers probe care for mentally ill inmates

As seen in the Houston Chronicle, much more info at the link.

The head of the troubled New York City jail system said Thursday it's critical to send mentally ill inmates to treatment programs instead of a lockup.

Department of Corrections Commissioner Joseph Ponte told state lawmakers that Rikers Island is poorly equipped to be a mental health treatment center. The primary goal, one he shares with the medical staff, is to keep staff and inmates safe, he said.

"Violence at Rikers Island the past five or six years has gone through the roof," Ponte said, adding that assaults on his medical staff have tripled.

Dr. Homer Venters, head of the jail's health services, testified alongside Ponte. He said admission medical screenings done on every incoming inmate show about 25 percent have mental illnesses, though that diagnosis applies to about 38 percent of the daily population of about 11,500. Those inmates tend to stay twice as long.
which brings up the question of:

Are the shrinks are competent to handle the problem? That is, beyond the usual quick fix of chemical straight jackets, or even just doping up the prisoners . . .

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Psychiatrist hired as chair at University of Alberta resigns amid sex scandal

As reported in the Star

A psychiatrist facing an allegation that he had sex with a patient in Ontario has resigned from his new job as department chair at the University of Alberta.

Dr. Claudio Soares was hired to head up the university’s psychiatry department effective Sept. 1, but was placed on leave before he could start.

The Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons is investigating a charge of professional misconduct against him. It’s alleged that Soares had a sexual relationship with a female patient between November 2007 and May 2009.

At the time, he was a professor at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont., and also director of the Women’s Health Concerns Clinic, which is affiliated with the school.

Jo-anne Nugent, a spokeswoman at the University of Alberta, said she couldn’t confirm when staff officially hired Soares or when they found out about the allegation against him.

The university’s website says he visited the Edmonton campus several times as a candidate for the job and made research presentations as early as January.

Nugent said Soares was placed on leave the same day he was to start as chair. And on Monday he “resigned effective immediately.”

Nugent wouldn’t say whether the university plans to review its hiring procedures.

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario issued a hearing notice about Soares on July 11. On Aug. 7, it sent a public notification to other provinces informing them that Soares was not to be left alone with female patients during its investigation.

Documents also allege that Soares failed to fully co-operate with an investigator from the college.

College spokeswoman Kathryn Clarke said Soares no longer has a licence to practise in Ontario. His certificate of registration expired on Sept. 1 when his academic appointment ended at McMaster.

“Despite the fact that he is no longer licensed, the referral to discipline remains in effect because we have continuing jurisdiction for professional misconduct or incompetence.”

She said it may take a couple of months before a hearing date is set.

Kelly Eby, a spokeswoman for the College of Physicians and Surgeons in Alberta, said it’s not known if Soares had applied to practise in the province, but he is not currently listed as having a licence or permit.

She said Soares didn’t necessarily need one. If his job as chair at the University of Alberta were strictly administrative, a permit would not have been required.

Man locked up 40 years in D.C. mental hospital for $20 necklace theft. Case raises questions about fairness within criminal justice system

From a Report in the Washington Times

Note: autoplay news videos not related to stories on page. turn your speakers off when visiting the link

The words come haltingly, the sentences trailing off into barely comprehensible asides: a story about an abusive father who drank himself to death, proud talk of his songwriting abilities and childhood memories of an older brother he still adores.

But Franklin Frye, 68, after all these years, speaks clearly about one thing: the arrest.

“They locked me up for no reason,” he said. “They never found the necklace on me I don’t know if they ever found it.”

It didn’t matter. Four decades ago, police charged him with stealing a $20 necklace, but Mr. Frye was found not competent to stand trial. If he’d been found guilty, he would’ve faced a fine or perhaps a short jail sentence. Instead, he’s spent most of his life inside the District’s psychiatric hospital, St. Elizabeth’s, feeling frustrated with, and forgotten by, the very system charged with looking after his welfare.

It’s a case that raises tricky questions about fairness within the criminal justice system and life inside St. Elizabeth’s. Indeed, for years the court system simply lost track of him.

Through the D.C. public defender’s office, Mr. Frye sought unconditional release in 2008, but his motion was filed on the docket of a dead judge, where it remained until earlier this year — with no apology or explanation from court officials.

“You end up being caught up in the system in a way you wouldn’t have if you were just guilty. It’s a tragedy,” said Steve Salzburg, a law professor at George Washington University and former deputy assistant attorney general.

Mr. Frye, who spoke publicly about his case for the first time in a recent interview with The Washington Times, is entitled to petition a judge for his release once a year. But it took nearly six years for his 2008 motion to receive any attention.

Hospital officials insist they separately review his files on their own and that previous attempts at releasing him into the community have failed.

“Mr. Frye is receiving appropriate care,” D.C. Department of Behavioral Health chief of staff Phyllis Jones wrote in an email.

But elder brother William Frye said nobody should have to eke out their entire lives in a city psychiatric ward. While he doesn’t deny that Franklin suffers from mental illness, he believes life in the hospital itself has made him worse, that anybody would “go crazy” if they had to spend more than four decades inside St. Elizabeth’s.
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/11/franklin-frye-languishes-in-dc-psych-ward-40-years/

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

East Mississippi Correctional Facility was supposed to house the state's psychiatrically disabled prisoners, providing intensive treatment services. [...] Instead, MTC ran it as a for-profit hellhole.

East Mississippi Correctional Facility is a cesspool. Prisoners are underfed and routinely held in cells that are infested with rats and have no working toilets or lights. Although designated as a facility to care for prisoners with special needs and serious psychiatric disabilities, ECMF denies prisoners even the most rudimentary mental health care services. Many prisoners have attempted to commit suicide; some have succeeded. One prisoner is now legally blind after EMCF failed to provide his glaucoma medications and take him to a specialist, and another had part of his finger amputated after he was stabbed and developed gangrene.​

This video is the story of two people forever damaged by their time at East Mississippi Correctional Facility. Prison sentences mean time behind bars, not abuse. The Mississippi Department of Corrections bears ultimate responsibility for these atrocities happening on their watch. Share this video to help end the abuse.



See this extensive report at News.MIC (with many links)

"If You Need That Proof America's Prison System Is Broken, Just Look to Mississippi"

More Information via Courthouse News

Two Top Liability Risks for Psychiatrists: Patients with Suicidal Behavior and Psychopharmacology

Snippets from a Press Release by PRM, still relevant today

Patient suicides may trigger the most lawsuits, but according to PRMS data, cases with the largest verdicts or settlements don't involve the death of a patient, but significant and permanent physical and neurological damage requiring lifelong care. Such damage can occur from things like renal failure from lithium toxicity, severe Stevens-Johnson Syndrome or brain damage from a suicide attempt.

"Defensive medicine is not the answer," said Jacqueline Melonas, RN, MS, JD, Senior Vice President of Risk Management for PRMS. "Care that has a sound clinical basis that also is well-documented is the best way to avoid or, if necessary, defend lawsuits."

[...]

Donna Vanderpool, MBA, JD, Assistant Vice President of Risk Management for PRMS, noted that breach of duty or negligence is just one element of a malpractice lawsuit. Other elements include duty of care (to meet a standard of care), damages or harm to the patient, and causation (the harm was caused by the breach).

"A plaintiff has to prove all four elements to win a medical malpractice lawsuit," Vanderpool noted.

During the session, PRMS also focused on another high-risk area for psychiatrists: psychopharmacology.

"Most psychiatric ailments are treated at least in part with medication, and much can go wrong when prescribing," said Denita Neal, JD, a Risk Manager with PRMS. Issues might include prescribing negligently, failing to monitor the medication or failing to obtain inadequate informed consent.

Monday, November 10, 2014

QUESTION: Where in the world could you go to find a place where half of all women are raped? ANSWER: Australia’s psychiatric hospitals.

Came across this news item from last year.

Still worth posting about

That’s the shocking conclusion of a new report from the Victorian Mental Illness Awareness Council (VIMIAC).

Their survey of women who have been in psychiatric wards in Victorian hospitals paints a shocking picture.

A terrifying 85 per cent said they had felt unsafe, with most saying they reported it to doctors and nurses and felt nothing was done. About 45 per cent had been sexually assaulted in hospital.

Just imagine the terror. You are alone, in a foreign place, completely under the control of medical staff, many of whom you have only just met, and surrounded by very disturbed people.

Even worse, you are disturbed: so depressed you unable to defend yourself, or perhaps already being tortured by fears, feelings or voices. There is a good chance you have a previous history of being assaulted, as such attacks vastly increase your chance of developing a mental illness.

It’s sickening. It’s happening now. And we are standing by and doing nothing.

“We expect people with mental illness to tolerate what no-one else would tolerate,” says Isabell Collins from VIMIAC. “It would only need to happen once in a general hospital ward and it would be fixed immediately.”

Yet, says Collins, she has been working in mental health for 25 years, “and sexual assault has been a problem for 25 years”.

Her survey included about 50 women from Victoria, but Collins says it does not overestimate the problem.

“If anything it underestimates it,” she says. “If you did the exact same survey in any state you would expect the same results”.

How could this be? How can we allow our most vulnerable people to be treated in this way? It’s hard not to agree with Collins that the answer is that society would rather just ignore mental illness, scared off by stigma and misinformation and a desire to sweep difficult problems under the carpet.

The incoming head of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, Mal Hopwood, says that while he can’t be sure on the exact proportion of women raped in care, there is clearly a problem that exists around the country.

“Certainly the numbers in that report suggest it’s not an insignificant problem,” he says.

He wants hospitals to be properly funded to enforce female-only areas and support women who are assaulted.

But he says fixing buildings and allocating spaces won’t be enough: an attitude change is needed as well.

You also have to wonder if our over-reliance on medication and biological psychiatry have helped downplay the importance of creating positive environments in psych hospitals.

After all, if mental illness is just a brain disease that needs the right medication, then surely a stark, busy, hospital environment will make no difference?

But mental illness is closely linked to both our personal experiences and the culture we are living in, and putting people in scary, loud and under-resourced hospitals cannot be helping.

I couldn’t have more admiration for many of the hard-working doctors and nurses working in public hospital psychiatric units, yet the truth is that most of these places are awful to be in.

Rape is the terrible tip of a huge problem that we have been ignoring for far too long.

Sunday, November 09, 2014

Psychiatrist and Fox News Channel analyst Keith Ablow freely mixes psychiatric assessments with political criticism, a unique twist in cable news commentary that some medical colleagues find unethical.

Commentary by David Bauder as seen on the Website for Channel 10 WISTV in Columbia, South Carolina.

Here are some snippets from the column, with my own brief comment. I recommend that you read it in full at the link above

[...]

He's been a Fox contributor since 2007 after hosting a failed syndicated talk show. Identified as a member of the Fox News Medical A-Team, he hosts a regular segment about behavior titled "Normal or Nuts?" on the "Fox & Friends" morning show. There were published reports this fall that the network had extended his contract.

Rival news networks CNN and MSNBC say they don't have a psychiatrist-commentator under contract. CNN said the closest thing it has to something similar is when profilers come on the air to discuss the mental characteristics of people who commit dramatic crimes, for example. The network said medical experts don't get into politics, but others can have different interpretations. The MRC's Graham said opinion often drifts in when television medical correspondents comment on aspects of Obama's health care plan.

Ablow clearly enjoys being provocative, and his commentaries don't stick to his areas of medical expertise. Within the past two weeks he called for an "American jihad," saying the country should urge all nations to adopt a government form based on the U.S. Constitution. His comment this summer that Michelle Obama "needs to drop a few" pounds was widely noticed.

[...]

Dr. Jeffrey Lieberman, chairman of psychiatry at Columbia University's College of Physicians and Surgeons, said Ablow seems more interested in entertaining than in reflecting well on his profession. Lieberman is past president of the American Psychiatric Association, which discourages members from speculating on psychiatric characteristics of non-patients.

"It is shameful and unfortunate that he is given a platform by Fox News or any other media organization," Lieberman said. "Basically he is a narcissistic self-promoter of limited and dubious expertise."

Ablow isn't an APA member, having resigned in 2011 in a dispute over transgenderism.

It's not unusual for there to be an uncomfortable relationship between the medical community and doctors who get into television. Talk show hosts Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz have their critics. Dr. Drew Pinsky took heat for exposing rehab patients to the pressure of a televised recovery.

While doctors are entitled to political opinions like anyone else, the way Ablow tries to connect his views to medical analysis "is really just irresponsible and it's embarrassing for physicians in general," said Ford Vox, a staff physiatrist at the Shepherd Brain Injury Rehabilitation Center in Atlanta.

Ablow has occasionally taken heat from Fox colleagues about his commentaries. Greg Gutfeld of "The Five" said that "we should probably avoid blaming people for tragedies," in response to Ablow's criticism of Obama on Ebola. And the four women co-hosts of "Outnumbered" clearly didn't appreciate the attack on the first lady's weight, made in context of her efforts to promote healthy eating.
Keith Ablow is a doctor without ethics, and is likely accusing President Obama of the the very things that Mr. Ablow is suffering from himself. Things like "severed himself from all core emotions." and so much more. Mr Bauder has done a great service in pointing out the professional hypocrisy and lack of ethics of Mr. Ablow. Too bad that Fox news has decided to profit from his lack of ethics instead of upholding professional standards.

We also note several followup columns on Mr. Ablow such as these

The strange case of Dr. Keith Ablow [Politico]

White House Foolishly Ignores Insights Of Fox ‘Dr.’ Keith Ablow, World’s Worst Psychiatrist [Wonkette]

Fox’s Keith Ablow Doubles Down on Psychoanalyzing Obama as a ‘Narcissist’ [Mediate]

Which is hilarious since Mr. Ablow is ever so likely to be a Narcissist himself.

Of course, he had to something to defend himself, not that it did him any good

Fox’s Keith Ablow fires back after fellow psychiatrists denounce him as a hack

Media Matters posted a mashup of some of Ablow’s past commentaries on Friday, which can be seen below.



On the basis that he is guilty of what he is accusing the President of, Keith Ablow is Toxic, and it is dangerous for your mental health to believe Keith Ablow.

While there may be plenty of legitimate reasons to dislike and and disagree with President Obama, those of discredited psych Keith Ablow are dangerous to American Politics.