Center for Cognitive Liberty & Ethics Vs Forced Medication of children

As seen in this press Release

In recent years there has been a dramatic increase in the number of American school children diagnosed with ADHD (Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder), and treated with medications like Ritalin or Adderall. In some cases, parents are reporting that school administrators are telling them that their child may not attend school unless the child is placed on psychostimulant drugs.

“Government benefits should not be conditioned on the use or nonuse of a psychotropic medicine,” says Richard Glen Boire, legal counsel for the Center for Cognitive Liberty & Ethics (CCLE), a nonprofit policy center devoted to protecting freedom of thought.


The CCLE today launches “Making Choices for Children,” a national campaign designed to call attention to this issue, and to educate parents on their legal right to make medication decisions for their children, free of coercion by school authorities.

While pro-Ritalin and anti-Ritalin groups have garnered most of the attention in this debate, the CCLE hopes to bring a new perspective to the problem – one that focuses on parental choice, rather than on the drugs themselves.

“Parents need to know that they are the ones vested with the legal power to make medication decisions in the best interest of their children,” says CCLE legal counsel Boire. “Some parents may decide to place their children on Ritalin, and others may decide not to. Our campaign aims to support a parent’s free and informed decision either way.”

To that end the CCLE plans to publish a free Parent’s Rights Kit, which will contain plain-language information on informed consent rights and additional resources for parents facing coercive school medication practices in their communities.

The CCLE is also working to educate policymakers on the problem, and supports legislation such as the Child Medication Safety Act (HR 1170), a bill currently before Congress that would block federal education funds from going to schools that condition a child’s attendance on the use of a medication like Ritalin.

To learn more, obtain helpful resources, or to get involved in returning medication decisions to parents, visit the campaign’s website.

Anti Psychiatry Protests on May First

A Press Release, as seen on the US Newswire

WHAT: Protestors Charge APA Psychiatrists with Creating Deadly Child Drugging Epidemic

-- With antidepressants Under Federal Investigation for Causing Child Suicides, Hundreds to protest the American Psychiatric Association Convention in New York City

WHEN: Saturday, May 1

WHERE: Jacob Javitz Center NYC

CONTACT: Marla Filidei at 213-798-3706

On Saturday May 1, hundreds of parents, children and human rights activists will don black T-shirts with the message, PSYCHIATRY IS KILLING YOUR CHILDREN to protest the opening of the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) annual congress being held at the Jacob Javitz Center in New York City. Leading the protest will be New York mother Patty Weathers, who said parents are fed up with psychiatrists telling them that their child's behavior is a "disorder" requiring dangerous psychiatric drugs. Mrs. Weathers' own story made the front page of the New York Post in 2003, after school officials reported her to Child Protective Services, which charged her with medical neglect after removing her son from an antidepressant that she claims turned him into a "Jekyll and Hyde."

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) only recently issued warnings about antidepressant drugs' potential to increase risks of suicide, after numerous parents testified before the FDA panel on Feb 2nd that the drugs had caused their children to kill themselves. The FDA is now under federal investigation since accusations came to light that it had suppressed evidence by one of its own medical experts, who found a "statistically significant" risk of serious suicidal events among children taking the drugs.

Sales of the drugs are more than $13 billion a year, which critics say is the key factor in psychiatry and the FDA suppressing information about the dangerous side effects of the drugs. More telling is that psychiatrists mislead parents about "mental disorders" being a "brain-based disease," or "chemical imbalance" without any scientific evidence to prove this.

Subsequently:

-- Between 1995 and 1999, the use of antidepressants for 7 to 12 year olds increased 151 percent and 580 percent for children under six, with children as young as 5 committing suicide.

-- Six million children and adolescents are prescribed cocaine- like stimulants and 2 million are taking Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants.

WHERE AND WHEN:

The rally meets at Gutenberg Playground on West 49th St. between 9th and 10th, at 10 a.m. Demonstrators will march down 11th Avenue to the Jacob Javits Plaza, where the protest will continue in front of the APA convention. There will also be a DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT, "PSYCHIATRY KILLS" in the Jacob Javits Plaza. APA members will be invited to tour the 120-foot long pictorial display, which documents a 300-year history of psychiatric abuse and failure, from electroshock and psychosurgery to the use of mind-altering psychotropic drugs.

California Investigation Finds Multiple Doctors Who Are Sex Offenders

As reported on NBC11 in the Bay Area

A two-month NBC11 investigation has uncovered a dirty secret in the medical world. Dozens of doctors in California are registered sex offenders. Some of them have lost their licenses -- others are treating patients. A battle has raged in Sacramento to stop that, but a lawsuit filed by doctors took the teeth out of a new protective law. NBC11's Angie Crouch spent the past two months digging through paperwork, confronting doctors and asking what the state is doing to protect you the patient. According to Crouch, dozens of physicians have been convicted of heinous sex crimes including child molestation, rape, sodomy and child pornography.

NBC11's computer search of the state's registered sex offenders found more than 30 doctors -- some had their medical licenses revoked. Six are currently practicing medicine in California.

In Marin County, NBC11 found Richard Jaqua. He is a physician and surgeon, convicted in 1988 of molesting a 5-year-old girl. His medical license was revoked after he served 10 months in jail, five years probation, and went to therapy, including more than four years in a sexual offender treatment program. But a check of the medical board's Web site shows Jaqua's license is now renewed and current. He is practicing medicine and on indefinite probation.

Another one of those doctors is Dr. Thomas Tartaro, a Southern California neurologist. Melanie Lira says she was one of Tartaro's victims. "With me bent over the table and him rubbing his body against mine," she said. The state medical board's independent enforcement monitor says Tartaro's license was revoked in 1995 after he was convicted of sexual battery on a restrained victim.

"This doctor sexually molested 24 female patients on multiple occasions over a three- or four-year period," Julianne Fellmeth, an independent enforcement monitor, told NBC11. Tartaro was sentenced to 90 days in jail, five years probation and had a 4-year prison term suspended on the condition he obey the guidelines of probation. But in 2001, some were surprised when the state medical board reinstated Tartaro's license allowing him to practice medicine again with restrictions that include not allowing him to treat women. Lira said it was not (enough. "Whatever) I had done was in (vain!" she said.)

Tartaro refuses to discuss his case with the media.

Not specific to psychs, but still very much in the public interest.

Drug blamed for suicide

As reported in the Intelligencer, a Philadelphia suburb newspaper, with a tip of the hat to the PseudoScience in Psych Blog

Julie Woodward had big plans. She wanted to "work really hard to get good grades." College in the city would be next. Marriage would wait until she was 26. And kids? Julie wanted at least two, "close in age like she and her sister were," her mom said.

Kathy Woodward doesn't have to read the hand-written list her daughter titled "Plan for life." She knows it by heart. The words, the ambition, the thirst for life, fit with the image of the girl the Woodwards knew. Not a death ended by suicide.

"Julie was so open to experiences, wanting to live," said Woodward, sitting in the sunroom of her North Wales home, where photos of Julie embracing her three younger siblings dominate the room. "This was a kid who had plans and hope, not a kid who would do something like this."

The 17-year-old North Penn High School student hung herself in the detached garage of her home on July 22, 2003. Kathy and her husband, Tom, believe her death was linked to side effects from Zoloft, an antidepressant Julie started that week - a drug they were told was safe and needed for Julie's treatment.

Why did she need to be on this drug?

The International Coalition For Drug Awareness

Here is part of the Mission Statement of the International Coalition for Drug Awareness

What is wrong with our focus on the "drug war" when 200,000 die each year from prescription drugs, yet approximately only 20,000 die as a result of illegal drug use?

Billions of dollars go into illegal drug issues in this country every year even though far more are dying from legal drugs. Everyone is asking, "Where is the FDA?" Busy approving another new drug? And how many more will die from that one?

A two-year Los Angeles Times investigation published in December, 2000 found that the seven drugs approved since 1993 have been withdrawn after reports of deaths and severe side. In the article written by Times Staff Writer David Willam, it states, "The FDA approved each of those drugs while disregarding danger signs or blunt warnings from its own specialists. Then, after receiving reports of significant harm to patients, the agency was slow to seek withdrawals."

Morton Mintz, a former Washington Post reporter, and a Nieman Fellow who won the Raymond Clapper award for reporting the thalidomide tragedy published a book in 1965 entitled, THE THERAPEUTIC NIGHTMARE. His warnings heeded then, and the warnings coming from many other men of great integrity since then, could have spared us the agony we have experienced from the drug tragedies since that time and those we are engulfed in today. He begins with, "Here we shall see that there have been instances when our excessive trust in certain Corporate Consciences has been rewarded with inadequately and even fraudulently tested drugs, with useless drugs and inferior versions of good drugs, with protraction of illness, and with waste of our money. In order that sales may begin and continue, regardless of whether we are healed and spared pain, evidence of serious and even lethal effects has been withheld from the responsible government agency and concealed from the medical profession and the public." (p.xiv)

We wish to honor him here (and those who have followed in his footsteps) in their unending efforts to warn us of these serious problems associated with the drugs we have come to learn to blindly trust. This site is to assist us in making sure that trust is no longer a "blind" trust. We must take the responsibility to educate ourselves about what we are putting into our bodies and brains.

Some of the most popular drugs on the market today are those that increase serotonin levels like the diet pills that were just pulled from the market. Originally Fen-Phen & Redux were thought to be so safe that 18 million people took the drugs. Now we know that they were so dangerous that those who took even one pill have been advised to have their hearts checked. If these drugs could be among the most popular on the market and touted as "the thing" for weight management for a two-year period, leaving a backlash of victims that attorney's offices cannot even begin to handle, what other mistakes will we wake up to tomorrow? What are you taking right now that could be just as dangerous or as damaging as these diet pills? What do you know about the medication you are currently taking? What do you know about the dangers of taking the drugs you are taking in combination with one another? Even more frightening to ask is "What does your doctor know or not know about the answers to these questions?"

Drugs like Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Luvox, Effexor, Serzone, Anafranil, etc. are some of the biggest money makers ever for the pharmaceutical companies. Yet are you aware that the use of Prozac among children from ages 6-12 went from 41,000 in 1995 to 203,000 in 1996. The number of new prescriptions written increased almost 400% in just one year?!! This is a very powerful mind-altering drug that has not been approved for use in children and yet our children are popping it like candy! Just Prozac's affect upon cortisol levels alone should frighten parents to death. One 30mg dose has been shown to clearly double the level of cortisol! (PROZAC PANACEA OR PANDORA?, p. 168) Increased cortisol impairs the development and regeneration of the liver, kidneys and muscles. It also retards linear growth. How many parents are given that information? How many doctors are aware of it themselves?

The study being used to gain FDA approval of this medication demonstrates that the rate of mania (a terrible form of insanity including symptoms of sexual compulsions, criminal behavior, alcohol cravings, rages leading to domestic violence, delusions of grandeur - often mistaken for increased self confidence, wild spending and varied types of criminal behavior) among children taking Prozac was three times higher than it is for adults. Three out of 100 had to drop out of the study due to this devastating complication which developed within a short eight week trial! The most logical question to ask is "Why do this to our children when there are many safer natural options that work as well without serious side effects?"

Doctor to appeal against sex assault conviction

Disgraced psychiatrist Michael Haslam, jailed for raping one of his patients and indecently assaulting two others, has been given leave to appeal against his conviction. The 69 year old, from Easingwold, was given seven years for attacking his patients, at the Clifton Hospital near York. He was also placed on the sex offenders' register. The judge at the Court of Appeal said his case should be heard as soon as possible in light of Haslam's age.

Thomas S. Szasz Cybercenter for Liberty and Responsibility

This web site is dedicated to the life and work of Thomas S. Szasz, M.D. In it you will find information from friends and colleagues sharing similar points of view to those of Thomas Szasz on diverse topics ranging from psychiatry and law, to drugs and addiction, to psychotherapy and public policy . . . and more. We share a common philosophy here: Liberty and responsibility are two sides of the same coin. No policy-- public or private--can increase or decrease one without increasing or decreasing the other. Human behavior has reasons, not causes.

The purpose of this site is to advance the debate about Thomas S. Szasz's basic ideas and their practical implications. He suggests the following summary statement as a manifesto...

Thomas Szasz's Summary Statement and Manifesto

1. "Myth of mental illness." Mental illness is a metaphor (metaphorical disease). The word "disease" denotes a demonstrable biological process that affects the bodies of living organisms (plants, animals, and humans). The term "mental illness" refers to the undesirable thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of persons. Classifying thoughts, feelings, and behaviors as diseases is a logical and semantic error, like classifying the whale as a fish. As the whale is not a fish, mental illness is not a disease. Individuals with brain diseases (bad brains) or kidney diseases (bad kidneys) are literally sick. Individuals with mental diseases (bad behaviors), like societies with economic diseases (bad fiscal policies), are metaphorically sick. The classification of (mis)behavior as illness provides an ideological justification for state-sponsored social control as medical treatment.

2. Separation of Psychiatry and the State. If we recognize that "mental illness" is a metaphor for disapproved thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, we are compelled to recognize as well that the primary function of Psychiatry is to control thought, mood, and behavior. Hence, like Church and State, Psychiatry and the State ought to be separated by a "wall." At the same time, the State ought not to interfere with mental health practices between consenting adults. The role of psychiatrists and mental health experts with regard to law, the school system, and other organizations ought to be similar to the role of clergymen in those situations.

3. Presumption of competence. Because being accused of mental illness is similar to being accused of crime, we ought to presume that psychiatric "defendants" are mentally competent, just as we presume that criminal defendants are legally innocent. Individuals charged with criminal, civil, or interpersonal offenses ought never to be treated as incompetent solely on the basis of the opinion of mental health experts. Incompetence ought to be a judicial determination and the "accused" ought to have access to legal representation and a right to trial by jury.

4. Abolition of involuntary mental hospitalization. Involuntary mental hospitalization is imprisonment under the guise of treatment; it is a covert form of social control that subverts the rule of law. No one ought to be deprived of liberty except for a criminal offense, after a trial by jury guided by legal rules of evidence. No one ought to be detained against his will in a building called "hospital," or in any other medical institution, or on the basis of expert opinion. Medicine ought to be clearly distinguished and separated from penology, treatment from punishment, the hospital from the prison. No person ought to be detained involuntarily for a purpose other than punishment or in an institution other than one formally defined as a part of the state's criminal justice system.

5. Abolition of the insanity defense. Insanity is a legal concept involving the courtroom determination that a person is not capable of forming conscious intent and, therefore, cannot be held responsible for an otherwise criminal act. The opinions of experts about the "mental state" of defendants ought to be inadmissible in court, exactly as the opinions of experts about the "religious state" of defendants are inadmissible. No one ought to be excused of lawbreaking or any other offense on the basis of so-called expert opinion rendered by psychiatric or mental health experts. Excusing a person of responsibility for an otherwise criminal act on the basis of inability to form conscious intent is an act of legal mercy masquerading as an act of medical science. Being merciful or merciless toward lawbreakers is a moral and legal matter, unrelated to the actual or alleged expertise of medical and mental health professionals.

6. In 1798, Americans were confronted with the task of abolishing slavery, peacefully and without violating the rights of others. They refused to face that daunting task and we are still paying the price of their refusal. In 1998, we Americans are faced with the task of abolishing psychiatric slavery, peacefully and without violating the rights of others. We accept that task and are committed to working for its successful resolution. As Americans before us have eventually replaced involuntary servitude (chattel slavery) with contractual relations between employers and employees, we seek to replace involuntary psychiatry (psychiatric slavery) with contractual relations between care givers and clients.

Thomas Szasz March 1998

New York to close Four Wind Psych Hospital - cited as 'incapable of fixing a litany of problems'

State regulators will close Four Winds hospital in Syracuse, NY because they say the psychiatric facility is incapable of fixing a litany of problems, including filthy conditions, lack of supervision and use of dangerous patient restraint practices.

In a letter sent to Four Winds on Monday, the state Office of Mental Health said it will revoke the hospital's operating certificate unless it agrees to voluntarily surrender the certificate.

The state's action stems from an inspection it conducted last month that turned up serious, widespread deficiencies at the 107-bed private hospital at 650 S. Salina St. The state ordered Four Winds to shut off admissions March 26 following that inspection. Those problems were similar to deficiencies inspectors discovered at the facility two years ago.

In the letter, James B. McQuide of the state Office of Mental Health wrote, ". . . it is clear that the corrective action implemented two years ago at Four Winds/Syracuse was neither sustained nor effective."

McQuide said his agency is not confident a plan of correction submitted by Four Winds would lead to permanent improvements. He also said the agency doesn't believe the hospital can ensure basic patient rights.

As reported in The Post Standard

Mental health workers visited patient without realizing she was dead.

If credentialed "mental health" professionals can't tell a live patient from a dead one, how can they presume to conclude and believe a head of another contains an ailing brain just by looking at it?

Mental health workers visited patient without realizing she was dead.

(Linked updated to use the Archive.org copy of the wwebpage)

quote:

A mental health charity is reviewing its home visit procedures after two members of staff visited a patient and left without realising she was dead. Mind launched the inquiry after an inquest heard how the two visitors left paranoid schizophrenic Patricia Harris in the kitchen of her Coventry bedsit after she made no response to their greetings. The death of the 43-year-old only came to light the following day when two other Mind staff visited and saw she had passed away.

Kay St Clair, director of Mind's Coventry branch, described the events surrounding Miss Harris' death as "unprecedented" in the charity's experience. "We have extended our deepest sympathies to Mr and Mrs Harris,"she said. "Coventry Mind is immediately conducting a full internal review of procedures and practices in addition to taking external help and advice from independent outside experts."

The inquest in Coventry has heard Helen Redmond, the assistant head of housing services for the city's branch of Mind, and James Howard, one of the charity's community psychiatric nurses, visited Miss Harris at her bedsit in Binley Road on August 13 after learning that she had not been seen for five days. Entering the flat, they saw Miss Harris dressed in outdoor clothing and positioned between the two kitchen walls. Unable to see her face or any movement, and hearing no response to their efforts to engage her in conversation, the pair left when the telephone rang, to allow her to answer it.

With a tip of the hat to the Stop Shrinks website

Website: Stop Shrinks

As seen at the website Stop Shrinks

What is NORMAL? Everything unexceptional. What is ABNORMAL? Everything exceptional.

An excellent collection of anti Psychiatry resources

Deadly Medicine: Creating the Master Race

The Holocaust Memorial Museum's new exhibit, "Deadly Medicine: Creating the Master Race," takes a chilling look at the Nazi use of eugenics and its applications. The term "eugenics" comes from the Greek word meaning "well-born." In the 20th century, it came to mean something far more sinister: a scientific movement to create a more perfect race. NPR's Christopher Joyce reports.

These were the men behind Hitler

11 deaths linked to psychiatrist

Eleven drug overdose deaths in Milwaukee and Waukesha counties have been linked to a Milwaukee psychiatrist who once held key posts at the Medical College of Wisconsin and a local veterans hospital, according to federal drug investigators.

Richard I.H. Wang, 79, is under investigation for prescribing dangerous levels of addictive painkillers such as OxyContin, Percocet and Valium, according to documents filed Friday in federal court in Milwaukee. Federal officials also suspect Wang of Medicare and Medicaid fraud, according to the documents. Wang, who has practiced medicine in Wisconsin for 40 years, has a history of complaints dating back to 1993.

The west side pharmacy that filled many of the prescriptions in question ordered more than 1,000% more of certain drugs from its supplier than others its size, the records show. The pharmacist there says he has contacted state licensing officials 10 times since 1998 about whether he should continue to fill Wang's prescriptions and was told it was fine.

In addition to the prescriptions, authorities are suspicious about hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of bills Wang submitted to Medicare and Medicaid. Wang generally spent very small amounts of time with each patient, yet submitted bills to the two federal programs indicating complex visits that lasted 40 minutes or more, according to court documents. Analysis of his bills shows that Wang claimed to have worked with Medicare and Medicaid patients for between 12 and 17 hours on at least six days in 2002 and 2003.In addition to the prescriptions, authorities are suspicious about hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of bills Wang submitted to Medicare and Medicaid. Wang generally spent very small amounts of time with each patient, yet submitted bills to the two federal programs indicating complex visits that lasted 40 minutes or more, according to court documents. Analysis of his bills shows that Wang claimed to have worked with Medicare and Medicaid patients for between 12 and 17 hours on at least six days in 2002 and 2003.

Why you can't trust medical journals anymore.

With financial ties to nearly two dozen drug and biotech companies, Dr. Charles B. Nemeroff may hold some sort of record among academic clinicians for the most conflicts of interest. A psychiatrist, a prominent researcher, and chairman of the department of psychiatry and behavioral science at Emory University in Atlanta, Nemeroff receives funding for his academic research from Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Wyeth-Ayerst--indeed from virtually every pharmaceutical house that manufactures a drug to treat mental illness. He also serves as a consultant to drug and biotech companies, owns their stocks, and is a member of several speakers' bureaus, delivering talks--for a fee--to other physicians on behalf of the companies' products.

But it was just three of Nemeroff's many financial entanglements that caught the eye of Dr. Bernard J. Carroll last spring while reading a paper by the Emory doctor in the prominent scientific journal, Nature Neuroscience. In that article, Nemeroff and a co-author reviewed roughly two dozen experimental treatments for psychiatric disorders, opining that some of the new treatments were disappointing, while others showed great promise in relieving symptoms. What struck Carroll, a psychiatrist in Carmel, Calif., was that three of the experimental treatments praised in the article were ones that Nemeroff stood to profit from--including a transdermal patch for the drug lithium, for which Nemeroff holds the patent.

As seen in the Washington Monthly

With a tip of the hat to the PsuedoScience in Psych Blog for their earlier story.

Study Debunks Use of Anti-depressants

As Reported on MSNBC

Four popular antidepressants being used to treat thousands of depressed American children are unsafe, ineffective or both, according to the first careful scientific review to include all available studies, including negative data that have long been withheld from public scrutiny by the pharmaceutical industry.

It is especially dangerous to prescribe Paxil, Zoloft, Effexor and Celexa for children who are suicidal, said British researchers who conducted the analysis published yesterday in the journal the Lancet, because the data show a clear increase in the risk of suicidal behavior among children taking the drugs -- and no benefit.

The study calls into question the repeated assurances of the American psychiatric establishment, which has regularly encouraged use of the medications in depressed children. It also contrasts sharply with the position of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which has had access to the same data but has never identified such serious problems.

The analysis involved no new data, but it is the first scientific "meta-analysis" of all available trials to be published in a peer-reviewed journal. As such, it puts the scientific debate over the medications on a new footing and deepens the chasm between the predominantly positive American view of the drugs and a growing stream of negative reviews by Australian, Canadian and British psychiatrists. The Lancet analysis backs up the warning by British regulators last year not to prescribe the medications to depressed children.

In a sharply worded editorial, the Lancet's editors said the trust of patients had been abused by doctors and the pharmaceutical industry, and that safety had been compromised in the search for profits. The state of the research, the editorial concluded, is riddled with "confusion, manipulation and institutional failure."

"If I wanted to introduce a new drug for children who are suicidal and said this has very little proof of efficacy and it has an increased risk of suicide, people would say I was mad," said Tim Kendall, director of the National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health in London, and one of the authors of the new study.

Yet, Kendall said, that is precisely the situation with the four drugs. Kendall's analysis, which was funded by the British government, contrasted the largely positive results of studies published by drug manufacturers with negative data that the companies call proprietary and have not published. British regulators recently made the unpublished data available for study.

Visit The Lancet Website here

To browse the content of THE LANCET web sites, you will first need to register: Registration is FREE and will only take a couple of minutes of your time.

Hate to say we told you so, but ....

Psychiatric Oppression continues in Russia

In case people thought differently, political use of psychiatry continues to the present day

Criminal prosecution case No. 8706 against The Radical Politics newspaper (“Radikalnaya Politika”) and its editor Boris Stomakhin keeps gaining momentum. Mr. Stomakhin was subpoenaed for interrogation in the prosecutor’s office of North-Eastern Administrative District of the city of Moscow for April 26 at 1:00 PM to report to special investigator Kolobova S.N. (office phone 7(095) 688-9608), who is in charge of this filthy and outright repressive political case.

Ms. Kolobova told Mr. Stomakhin that psychiatric medical examination has already been scheduled for him for May 24, 2004, which she promised during the first interrogation on April 13.

It is not the first time when Putin’s government is trying to use psychiatric methods, notorious since the Soviet times, against the editor of The Radical Politics. Back then the KGB used to resort to its favorite trick to declare the dissidents, the opponents of the Soviet system, or just plainly thinking people, as mentally sick and lock them up in psychiatric wards, where they were injected huge doses of neuroleptics, which made them lose their mind and which was ruining their health, and where the dissidents were subjected to all sorts of physical tortures. FSB investigator I. Asochakov offered Mr. Stomakhin to undergo psychiatric medical examination last year, when Mr. Stomakhin was a witness in the previous case against The Radical Politics. There is also some confidential information that the FSB (Russian Federal Security Service, formerly known as the KGB) has been asking Mr. Stomakhin’s acquaintances and wondering about his mental health since the end of 2001.

Revolutionary Contact Union is hereby making a decided and strong protest against the revival of such practices in present-day Russia, even against the slightest attempts to return to punitive psychiatric methods. In expectation of the KGB-controlled psychiatric medical examination with the conclusions known in advance, we are publishing the document issued to Mr. Stomakhin on the results of his checkup by psychiatrists from Independent Psychiatric Association of Russia.

Dr Selwyn Leeks faces a second investigation for sexual misconduct

Melbourne, Australia child psychiatrist, Dr Selwyn Leeks, faces a second investigation by the Victorian Medical Practitioners Board, as well as possible criminal charges in New Zealand. Dr Leeks is already being investigated by the board following claims that he allowed children to be punished with electric shock treatment and pain-inducing injections while in charge of a psychiatric hospital unit in NZ in the 1970s.

Now a former female patient has accused the Cheltenham-based doctor of sexual misconduct when he treated her for anxiety in Melbourne in 1979-80. Outlining the allegations for the first time, the former patient told The Sunday Age that over several visits Dr Leeks had asked her to sit on his knee, fondled her and requested sexual acts. The woman, who did not wish to be identified, said she had given the Victorian Medical Practitioners Board a statement and was interviewed by an official from the board last month.

Expert Kept From Speaking at Antidepressant Hearing

According to a New York Times report, Top Food and Drug Administration officials have admitted that they barred the agency's top expert from testifying at a public hearing about his conclusion that antidepressants cause children to become suicidal because they viewed his findings as alarmist and premature.

Dr. Andrew D. Mosholder, an agency epidemiologist, was the man charged with analyzing 22 studies involving 4,250 children and seven drugs. In a carefully argued, 33-page memorandum, he concluded that children given antidepressants were almost twice as likely as those given placebos to become suicidal.

The controversy had its start when GlaxoSmithKline sought a six-month extension to its patents on Paxil. To help guide pediatricians' prescribing habits, federal law grants such extensions when companies test their medicines in children.

The company's studies in depressed children failed to show any positive effect. It was a disappointing finding, but patent extensions are granted even when studies fail. Reviewing the data, Dr. Mosholder noticed in October 2002 that they showed a disturbing number of problems listed under the category, "emotional liability." Suicidal thoughts and self-injurious behavior were among the things lumped into this category. Dr. Mosholder asked GlaxoSmithKline to provide more detail about these cases, according to one of the documents.

In May 2003, the company submitted a new report. It showed that children given Paxil were more likely to become suicidal than those given placebos. In June, the agency announced that doctors should avoid using Paxil in depressed children.

Three days later, according to documents and interviews, the agency asked for similar data from the makers of Prozac, Zoloft, Luvox, Celexa, Wellbutrin, Effexor, Serzone and Remeron.

Current Research on AntiDepressants promotes bad medicine

As reported in the British Medical JournaL

How safe and effective are antidepressants in children and adolescents? The authors of this review have found disturbing shortcomings in the methods and reporting of trials of newer antidepressants in this patient group.

To put it bluntly,

Conclusions on the efficacy of newer antidepressants in childhood depression have exaggerated their benefits
Additional benefit from drugs is of doubtful clinical significance
Adverse effects have been downplayed
Antidepressant drugs cannot confidently be recommended as a treatment option for childhood depression

As noted toward the end of the paper,

Randomised controlled trials usually underestimate the serious adverse effects of drugs. The fact that serious adverse effects with newer antidepressants are common enough to be detected in randomised controlled trials raises serious concerns about their potential for harm.

The magnitude of benefit is unlikely to be sufficient to justify risking those harms, so confidently recommending these drugs as a treatment option, let alone as first line treatment, would be inappropriate.

In other words, it's bad medicine.

Australian 13 year old candidate for Sex Change procedures

An Australian court has given the go-ahead for a 13-year-old girl who wants to be a boy to begin a "sex change" process, prompting strong criticism and calls for government intervention. The girl, known only as "Alex," will be allowed to begin taking hormones - initially estrogen and progestogen to suppress menstruation and the feminization of her young body and, at the age of around 16, testosterone to begin the masculinization process.

The court heard that her father, with whom she was very close and who treated her as if she was a boy, died when she was five. The court was unable to contact her estranged mother, whose whereabouts are unknown. With onset of puberty, Alex began to develop suicidal tendencies, which the judge said was "due to his body not matching his male gender identity."

I remember a guy who was on Oprah many years ago. He convinced his mother to mortgage her house, incurring massive debt, so that he could have a sex change operation to become a woman. When it was all said and down. He then discovered that he really wanted to be a man in the first place, that the sex change was not what he thought it was.

In both cases the mind boggles both at the courts, and at the competency of the therapists.

Rehabilitating a School Psychologist?

An Akron Public Schools psychologist charged with soliciting prostitution has completed a court diversion program that will keep him from carrying a criminal record. Meanwhile, school board members are trying to determine whether they should discipline Patrick McGown, who has no apperent blemishes on his 27-year career with the district.

McGown, 51, was arrested about 10 a.m. Dec. 9 for receiving oral sex from a prostitute during a weekday work shift. The incident occurred in a University of Akron parking deck on East Buchtel Avenue.

McGown's court case is concluding at the same time city and court officials are getting tougher on those who commit prostitution-related crimes. Within the last week, the eligibility requirements for the court diversion program have been changed to exclude solicitation and prostitution offenders, said Chief City Prosecutor Doug Powley.

``This case had nothing to do with our decision,'' Powley said. ``There has been some discussion over a period of time whether to allow this type of offense to be included in diversion. There have been many complaints throughout neighborhoods of Akron about problems prostitution causes.'

Woman whose son was abused at center says ordeal isn't over

Her son's abusers are in prison and a settlement with the state of Missouri has just been finalized, but there's no end to the ordeal that Donna Uhlmansiek and her family have faced for four years.

Uhlmansiek's son, now 14, is among eight boys who were believed to have been the victims of a wide range of abuse at a state-run mental health center in Marshall, Mo. According to reports, boys at the Marshall Habilitation Center were slammed against floors, hit with books, forced into cold showers and made to attack each other.

Four former workers are behind bars for what went on at the center in August 2000. Last month, Uhlmansiek's son was awarded $950,000 in a settlement with the state. The mother said no amount of money will help her son recover from the trauma he went through. For the past 14 months, the boy has required round-the-clock care at a psychiatric hospital.

Even with the money, Uhlmansiek said her family must depend on a state mental health system she does not fully trust. The boy's treatment can cost more than $25,000 a month. The family can't seek private care without depleting the trust fund in as little as two years. Instead, the boy remains in state care under the Medicaid program.

"Unfortunately the settlement does not give us the financial independence we would need to not have to involve the state in his life," she said. At least four families have sued the state over the treatment at the Marshall center. Three were represented by the Jefferson City law firm of Roger Brown and Associates. Chris Slusher, a lawyer at the firm, said the two other families in the suit settled for $600,000 each last year. Uhlmansiek said she would have liked the case to have gone to trial, but following through after the other families had settled seemed daunting.

Oppositional Defiant Disorder

As reported in the Telegraph

Scientists in America have devised a new syndrome that 'explains' bad behaviour in under-10s - Oppositional Defiant Disorder Children who behave badly are no longer described as naughty but suffering from Oppositional Defiant Disorder - or ODD syndrome.

The condition, which was established by scientists in America, is said mainly to affect children under 10 and result in a number of disruptive symptoms including defiance, provocative conduct and disobedience. Literature on the subject says that sufferers "argue persistently with adults", "actively refuse to comply with adults' requests or rules" and "often deliberately annoy people". Other ODD children are said to "consistently blame others for their own misbehaviour". ODD is one of about 300 classified mental disorders - most identified in the US - that doctors and psychologists use to explain bad behaviour. Some of these "conduct disorders" are considered to be treatable with drugs such as Ritalin. [...]

Michele Elliott, the director of the child welfare charity Kidscape, said: "Other parents are getting fed up with sending their well-behaved children to school only for them to have their lessons disrupted by children who are not properly disciplined. "I do not believe that we should be excusing bad behaviour with medical terms. What we need is a situation where children face consequences for their actions and good parenting skills."

The Office for National Statistics study, published earlier this year, found that children from the poorest backgrounds were three times more likely to have conduct disorders than those whose parents were in professional occupations, and that children of lone parents were twice as likely to suffer from poor mental health as those living with couples.

Another disease, another potential market.

Sex allegations freeze psychologist's license

A judge has suspended the license of an Albany psychologist following a patient's accusations he fondled her genitals, kissed her and sucked her toes to create a stronger patient-therapist bond, according to written allegations from the California Board of Psychology.

California Administrative Law Judge Ruth Astle suspended the license of Jeffrey Arthur LeRoux, who practiced in Berkeley, for gross negligence and sexual misconduct with a patient.

LeRoux also is accused of improper distribution of prescription drugs, including Prozac, and failure to maintain records of therapy sessions with the patient, who reported the alleged misconduct early last year. She reportedly went to LeRoux, 53, on a referral from Alameda County Mental Health Access for treatment of post traumatic stress disorder and childhood sexual abuse.

This story is starting to get some play in California

Parents not told of child psychiatrist caught with child pornography

Berkshire (England) mental healthcare director Philippa Slinger has denied there was a cover-up when parents were not told a psychiatrist who treated 176 youngsters had been trapped in a police child porn probe. Married father-of-two Julian Morrell was suspended for a year by the General Medical Council on Tuesday after it heard he paid to watch internet pornography involving children on his home computer. He was trapped in the nationwide police dragnet codenamed Operation Ore which also brought the arrest of The Who guitarist Pete Townsend.

But the GMC ruled that while viewing the images was tantamount to child abuse he should not be permanently struck off because he does not pose a threat. Dr Morrell, of Banbury Road, Oxford, used the US-based site in 1999 while working in Oxford-shire and did not become a consultant with the Reading-based Berkshire Healthcare NHS Trust until 2001. A month after discovering the allegations in January last year the trust sacked him - but families were not told until last week.

This story has been reported widely in Britain

Do You want to talk Chimp?

The Zoological Society of London (ZSL) is calling for volunteers to take part in a major new study into human and chimpanzee behaviours. Animal behaviour experts at ZSL are asking volunteers to 'talk chimp' in everyday life and see how primate patter can resolve workplace conflicts, express emotions and strengthen human bonds. The results of this major study will be published later in the year to see just how 'talking chimp' can help in everyday life.

They believe that "Talking like Chimps" is a viable solution to a number of human problems.

Instead of bitching about your terrifying boss behind their back, try showing them your fear by baring your teeth and using submissive body language such as lowering your head and crouching. [...] Organisational psychologist Professor Cary Cooper told BBC News Online that anyone willing to try it could learn a lot from our chimp cousins. "We should not be aggressive towards those in authority, as animals can be, but we should express our feelings."

The Mind Boggles

British Child psychiatrist accessed Child Porn

A consultant child psychiatrist could be struck off Britain's medical register [removing his ability to practice] after admitting he accessed child pornography on his home computer.

Morrell, 41, of Banbury Road in Oxford, was a senior registrar at Park Hospital for Children in Headington at the time, between January 1999 and January 2000. He was also a clinical lecturer in child and adolescent psychiatry at the same hospital.

Morrell was arrested in January last year as part of Operation Ore, the British arm of an international inquiry into child pornography on the internet.

As seen online here

Pharmaceutical companies tried HIV drug on orphans: scandal in which babies and children were allegedly used as 'laboratory animals'

As seen here

Also as reported here, in the Observer

Orphans and babies as young as three months old have been used as guinea pigs in potentially dangerous medical experiments sponsored by pharmaceutical companies, an Observer investigation has revealed. British drug giant GlaxoSmithKline is embroiled in the scandal. The firm sponsored experiments on the children from Incarnation Children's Centre, a New York care home that specialises in treating HIV sufferers and is run by Catholic charities.

The children had either been infected with HIV or born to HIV-positive mothers. Their parents were dead, untraceable or deemed unfit to look after them. According to documents obtained by The Observer, Glaxo has sponsored at least four medical trials since 1995 using Hispanic and black children at Incarnation. The documents give details of all clinical trials in the US and reveal the experiments sponsored by Glaxo were designed to test the 'safety and tolerance' of Aids medications, some of which have potentially dangerous side effects. Glaxo manufactures a number of drugs designed to treat HIV, including AZT. Normally trials on children would require parental consent but, as the infants are in care, New York's authorities hold that role.

The city health department has launched an investigation into claims that more than 100 children at Incarnation were used in 36 experiments - at least four co-sponsored by Glaxo. Some of these trials were designed to test the 'toxicity' of Aids medications. One involved giving children as young as four a high-dosage cocktail of seven drugs at one time. Another looked at the reaction in six-month-old babies to a double dose of measles vaccine. Most experiments were funded by federal agencies like the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Until now Glaxo's role had not emerged.

In 1997 an experiment co-sponsored by Glaxo used children from Incarnation to 'obtain tolerance, safety and pharmacokinetic' data for Herpes drugs. In a more recent experiment, the children were used to test AZT. A third experiment sponsored by Glaxo and US drug firm Pfizer investigated the 'long-term safety' of anti-bacterial drugs on three-month-old babies. The medical establishment has defended the trials arguing they enabled these children to obtain state-of-the-art therapy they would otherwise not have received for potentially fatal illnesses.

However, health campaigners argue there is a difference between providing the latest drugs and experimentation. They claim many of the experiments were 'phase 1 trials' - among the most risky - and that HIV tests for babies were not a reliable indicator of actual infection and therefore toxic drugs could have been given to healthy infants. HIV drugs are similar to those used in chemotherapy and can have serious side-effects.

Much more at the links.

Of course, GlaxoSmithKline is the manufacturer of Paxil, among other psychiatric drugs. Somehow it is not surprising that their possible misdeeds would not be restricted to one particular product line.

The TV - ADD Connection

The more television children watch between the ages of 1 and 3, the greater their risk of having attention problems at age 7, U.S. researchers reported on Monday. They found that each hour of television that preschoolers watched per day increased the risk of attention problems such as attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder, by almost 10 percent later on. The study, published in the April issue of Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, adds inattention to the list of harmful effects of excessive television viewing that also includes obesity and violent behavior.

See this Rueters Report

See this report by Julie Davidow

Which begs the question: Is the solution less TV, or more drugs?

I would not call it inattention, but totally distracted.

To be fair, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that children younger than 2 not watch any television. However, according to a recent study by the Kaiser Family Foundation, 26 percent of children younger than 2 have televisions in their rooms and 36 percent of families leave the television on almost all of the time, even when no one is watching.

The best kids I ever saw didn't have TV until after they entered school

Child Antidepressant Use Skyrockets

Antidepressant drug use is up, especially among kids age 5 and younger.

The new numbers come from the databases of Express Scripts Inc., the third largest U.S. pharmacy benefit manager. The sample includes nearly 2 million kids aged 18 and younger covered by medical insurance from 1998 to 2002.

Teen girls are more likely to get antidepressants than any other group, but the fastest increase is among kids 5 years old and younger. For these children antidepressant use is up 100% to 0.16% of girls and up 62% to 0.23% of boys, says Tom Delate [pronounced DELL-at], PhD, Express Scripts' director of research.

"In teenagers, antidepressant use is really exploding," Delate tells WebMD. "Antidepressant use among the very young is increasing even more rapidly. Their rate of use is much lower than among older children -- but we're seeing a doubling of population using it."

Among the findings, reported in the April issue of Psychiatric Services:

* Overall child antidepressant use increased by 9.2% each year from 1998 to 2002.
* Antidepressant prescriptions are increasing faster for girls than for boys.
* Serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors -- SSRIs such as Celexa, Luvox, Paxil, Prozac, and Zoloft -- are more commonly prescribed for child patients than other antidepressants.
* Paxil use increased 113% in girls and 91% in boys from 1998 to 2002.
* Data show doctors prescribe antidepressants more for depression than for anxiety disorders.

The Death Penalty And Psychiatric Madness

Commentary Seen at Infoshop News

The January 6 execution of Charles Singleton, who was convicted of homicide and sentenced to death in 1979 in Arkansas, represents a great ethical quandary for psychiatry and its involvement in the criminal justice system, argues Alan A. Stone in a March Psychiatric Times commentary. The perception that Singleton's psychiatrist might have been facilitating an execution by prescribing Singleton psychiatric drugs is a grave ethical issue for Stone and the psychiatric profession. It's worth noting here what Stone doesn't consider to represent an ethical quandary for psychiatry.

Nowhere does Stone feel the need to concede that the power of the state, the State of Arkansas in this case, to coerce a jail inmate to take drugs and, hence, rationalize executing him, is a power that the psychiatric profession, in alliance with the mental health movement, has tirelessly lobbied for. It's coercive psychiatric treatment laws in and of themselves that are unethical. It is the alliance between psychiatry and state that is unethical in and of itself. We wouldn't even be having stupid debates about whether or not a drug can make a defendant understand the charges and proceedings against him if psychiatry wasn't so intertwined with the legal system today.

These issues invariably revolve around the insanity defense, another issue which inspires no debates about ethics among the psychoquacks.

The fact that an obviously guilty criminal defendant, like John Hinckley, can be exonerated for his criminal acts, in part because he says he was trying to impress actress Jodi Foster, does not raise an ethical quandary for psychiatry. When somebody like Hinckley, who committed his crime before many a television camera, copps the insanity plea, he'll find a line of psychoquacks from Seattle to San Francisco willing to testify on his behalf. In mental health law guilty people like Hinckley can be excused when they put up a successful insanity defense.

The fact that people like Hinckley are generally locked up and involuntarily treated is a footnote to this. The fact is they are excused for their actions. Meanwhile, innocent people not charged with crimes can be locked up by way of involuntary civil commitment.

This is the morally bankrupt world of mental health law and it sparks no debates about ethics among psychiatrists.

Ex-psychiatrist admits selling prescriptions in Medicaid fraud

A former New York psychiatrist who maintained a medical practice at his High Falls home has plead guilty to charges he illegally sold thousands of prescriptions for depressants and narcotic drugs that were billed to Medicaid.

David Roemer, 44, of 1416 state Route 213, pleaded guilty Tuesday in state Supreme Court in the Bronx before Justice Phylis Bamberger to a charge of felony conspiracy. Roemer's plea was part of a negotiated plea deal. As part of the deal Roemer is expected to be sentenced May 7 to 3 to 10 years in prison.

Roemer and 33 other individuals were indicted in November 2003 on charges including criminal sale and possession of controlled substances, grand larceny and conspiracy, according to a press release from the state Attorney General's Office. The release said that by his plea Roemer admitted he was a key member of a conspiracy to defraud the Medicaid program and traffic in diverted medications worth millions of dollars on the street.

Roemer admitted that between May 2002 and November 2002 he unlawfully sold thousands of prescriptions for depressants and narcotic drugs to Medicaid recipients who were transported from New York City to his Ulster County practice by other members of the conspiracy, the release said. The prescriptions included ones for the addictive narcotic painkiller Percocet, the anti-anxiety drug Xanax, and OxyContin, a synthetic form of morphine.

California Psychologist suspended amid misconduct allegations

An Albany, California psychologist may soon lose his license over accusations of sexual misconduct by a female patient.

Jeffrey Arthur LeRoux, 53, awaits a revocation hearing on claims that he "sexualized" his psychotherapy sessions with a woman who sought help in late 2002 for childhood sexual abuse and post-traumatic stress disorder. The alleged conduct included sucking her toes, and graduated to rubbing her genitals under the guise of "energy work," and to oral sex.

According to the allegations, LeRoux once disrobed himself and asked her to fondle him, saying it "was part of therapy, and they should imagine she was 3 years old and he was 5 years old."

His accuser, identified only by her initials, claims she tried to end contact with LeRoux, who was married, but he began coming to her home twice weekly to engage her in sexual activity. She complained last May to the state Board of Psychology. Last week, Administrative Law Judge Ruth Astle suspended his license pending the hearing.

LeRoux, a state-licensed psychologist since 1995 and a lecturer with San Francisco State's College of Extended Learning, could not be reached. His Oakland attorney, Robert Beles, said his client admits a sexual relationship, but denies a professional one.

Woodlands Texas psychiatrist among 7 indicted in wheelchair scam

A psychiatrist from The Woodlands plead guilty Thursday to receiving kickbacks for recommending unneeded motorized wheelchairs in a conspiracy to defraud Medicare and Medicaid of $16 million.

Dr. Lewis Gottlieb, 45, was one of seven people indicted in September on charges of bilking the government out of $5,000 on each unneeded or undelivered wheelchair. U.S. District Judge Lee Rosenthal ordered Gottlieb to forfeit $1.6 million held in his bank account.

Gottlieb is to be sentenced June 24 for conspiracy to commit health fraud, executing a health care fraud scheme and receiving kickback payments between October 2001 and May 2003. He could get five years in prison on the conspiracy charge, 10 years on the health fraud charge and five years on the kickback charge.

Prozac Nation, UK. Doctors Overdosing The People

Hundreds of thousands of people in Britain are being prescribed powerful anti-depressants that they may not need because doctors are using the pills as a "quick fix" solution to mild anxiety problems, according to a report published today.

Desperate shortages of NHS counsellors and therapists mean that over-worked GPs often feel they have no option but to hand out anti-depressants to people who may only need an outlet for discussing their problems. Eighty per cent of GPs admit that they are over-prescribing drugs such as Prozac and Seroxat when patients may simply need someone to talk to.

The research reveals the extent to which Britain has become a "Prozac Nation", with more than six million people now taking pills to prop up their mood. Campaigners said the level of drug-prescribing had reached alarming levels, while some patients said they had been handed pills "as if they were sweets".

The survey of 250 GPs by Norwich Union Healthcare found that eight out of 10 admitted that they were over-prescribing anti-depressants, and three-quarters said they were handing out more of the drugs than they did five years ago.

Bizarre sex case gets 5 years in prison

As reported in the Stamford Advocate

A Bridgeport man who plead guilty to charges related to his impersonation of a doctor and conducting gynecological exams was sentenced Friday to 10 years, suspended after five years, according to the Connecticut Post's detailed reports. Barry Lichenthal also was ordered to make $6,000 in restitution to the state and register as a sex offender. Lichenthal, 59, has plead guilty to fourth-degree sexual assault, practicing medicine without a license, first-degree larceny, reckless endangerment and practicing pharmacy without a license. He was arrested in April 2003.

State officials suspended the medical license of Lichenthal's wife, Dr. Liane Leedom, a Trumbull psychiatrist. She was accused of misleading patients into believing that her husband was a licensed physician and allowing him to examine female patients. Leedom, 42, was arrested in January on charges of allowing Lichenthal to illegally run the clinic while she was gone. Her case is pending in Hartford Superior Court.

Leedom was medical director of Noah's Ark Foundation, a methadone treatment center. She also ran a mood disorder clinic.

(See also this report from WFSB)

Eli Lily under investigation for psych drug marketing practices

The U.S. Justice Department is investigating the marketing practices of Eli Lilly and Co., the drugmaker said on Thursday, the most recent in a slew of probes into sales practices by big pharmaceutical companies. Lily said the investigation likely targets promotional practices for its best-selling product, the $4.3 billion-a-year schizophrenia treatment Zyprexa, as well as antidepressant Prozac.

Federal and state investigators in Pennsylvania have been particularly active in pursuing drugmakers and other health-care companies that might be engaging in improper practices to boost their profit.

Other drugmakers in recent years have had to pay sizable fines to settle allegations that they had bilked the federal Medicare and state Medicaid insurance programs for the poor and elderly by overcharging for their products.

Ohio's Mental Health System broken

The Enquirer on cincinatti.com has been investigating the Mental Health System in Ohio. They found that Ohio's system for treating children with mental illness is entrenched in bureaucracy and plagued by abuse.

See the full report here Among other things, they found:

• To get public help, thousands of parents who can't afford treatment give custody of their kids to the government.
• Some children sent to treatment centers are abused, molested, overdrugged or left to live in wretched conditions.
• No one's in charge. Two state agencies and hundreds of county agencies confound even the people running them.

Gov. Bob Taft acknowledges that Ohio's mental health system doesn't work for thousands of families.

Of course, some suggest funding more of the same old thing that got them into trouble in them first place

Animals may be the future's therapists

60 psychiatric patients will work on Norwegian farms in order to determine the theraputic effect on patients who spend time working with farm animals.

The Norwegian Ministry of Agriculture informed that the project is directed by Agricultural University of Norway (NLH) and University of Oslo and the goal is to establish the effect of animal contact has on people with psychiatric illnesses. According to the Ministry of Agriculture, taking care of farm animals and working on a farm is a part of the treatment for the 60 patients who are participating in this new project.

Sounds better than being cooped up in a ward someplace. Dealing with a part of the real world, in a peaceful environment. who would have thought?

Read the full report here

FDA issues suicide caution for antidepressants

As reported on CNN

Patients on some popular antidepressants should be closely monitored for warning signs of suicide, the government warned Monday in asking the makers of 10 drugs to add the caution to their labels. Although the Food and Drug Administration's investigation into the possible suicide connection initially focused on children given the drugs, its warning is aimed at both adult and pediatric use of the pills to alleviate depression.

See the FDA public advisory here

See the FDA Information Page here (lots of info)

Banned 'sex' psychologists still at large

Disgraced Australian psychologists whose registrations have been cancelled for having sex with patients are still treating troubled clients. The failed practitioners are using legal loopholes to practise as counsellors, despite being struck off the Psychologists Registration Board.

A Herald Sun investigation has found a Fitzroy psychologist who had sex with a woman he was treating for marriage difficulties is now a relationship counsellor.

Paul Francis Mott was struck off four years ago for having an affair with a 30-year-old flight attendant who he was seeing for marriage problems. Mr Mott, who was also treating the woman's husband, accepted payment from the couple throughout the two-year affair. Mr Mott, 57, now advertises his marriage and family counselling business in the Yellow Pages and says he treats at least 10 regular patients every week.

Counselling is an unregulated industry and medical qualifications are not required to practise.

Playing Doctor on TV - Dr. Phil as PsychoEntertainment

As seen in this Salon article

When Neal David Sutz walked through the Paramount studio gate, he was looking forward to seeing a psychologist he respected, talk show host Phil McGraw. Sutz didn't know he was about to get caught in the awkward intersection of entertainment and counseling where "Dr. Phil" holds ground.

A mental health activist who himself had undergone treatment, Sutz hoped to attend a taping and connect with McGraw afterward to enlist his help in a public information campaign. Instead, the Mesa, Ariz., paralegal student was stopped short by paperwork. He and other would-be audience members were asked to sign a waiver attesting they didn't suffer from mental illness and weren't under psychiatric care.

The waiver also said that McGraw's statements shouldn't be considered therapy or a substitute for any form of therapy. Talking to a show representative, Sutz was told he could attend but couldn't talk to Dr. Phil or participate in the show -- for Sutz's own protection.

He left instead. The incident, which occurred last fall, has weighed on him; so much for "Doctor" Phil, he said in an interview.

The disclaimer signals "that his advice is not real medical, psychological advice at all," said Sutz. "It is pure entertainment and he should stop insinuating that it is anything but that, especially not real counseling."

Woman seeks penalty for therapist who molested her.

A Horror Story in which a woman cannot get her justice against the psych who molested her

GREENSBORO NC -- On the surface, it appeared to be a case against all odds: a woman who suffered from mental illness and said she had 80 personalities suing a respected therapist and college professor and challenging the state board assigned to watch over him.

Even the lawyer who took Angela Spell's case originally had trouble believing her claim: From 1996 to 1999, Greensboro psychotherapist and licensed nurse Daniel Longenecker had sexually exploited her. And the N.C. Board of Nursing had taken no disciplinary action in response to her complaint.

But Spell's story never changed -- that Longenecker had sex with her, that he made her eat feces, that he confessed their relationship to a friend of Spell's, that the nursing board never interviewed her for its investigation. The deeper attorney Phyllis Lile-King looked, the more convinced she became that Spell was telling the truth. Spell won her lawsuit when a jury found Longenecker liable for violating a state law called the Psychotherapist-Patient Sexual Exploitation Act

Now Spell is taking on another fight: trying to convince the nursing board about her allegation that it has a sexual predator in its midst. Seven months after Spell won a $176,000 civil court judgment against Longenecker, neither the N.C. Board of Nursing nor UNCG, where he teaches nursing, has done anything to limit his professional contact with the public. A nursing-board official says there was no credible evidence of Spell's claim in 2000, when she filed her first complaint. Since that time, Spell won her court victory, and, along with her current therapist, filed a new complaint urging a new investigation. But Donna Mooney, the board's director of discipline, said that the board's position hasn't changed.

She said the board takes all complaints seriously. But she wouldn't discuss details of its investigation or whether investigators contacted Spell, who said she was never interviewed about the complaint.

UNCG hasn't launched an investigation either. A lawyer for UNCG said the school won't discipline Longenecker -- who didn't return numerous phone calls -- unless the nursing board takes action. So, Longenecker continues to teach. One of his classes this semester concerns treating patients with psychosocial problems. He continues to supervise students working as interns. And he continues to have UNCG's permission to treat psychotherapy patients in his office on campus -- permission the university could withdraw at any time. UNCG attorney Skip Capone called Longenecker an exemplary faculty member who has received good evaluations from students and no complaints of wrongdoing. Because Spell isn't a student and because the exploitation that was the subject of the lawsuit didn't take place on campus, there's little the university can do, he said.

Spell, who lives in Trinity, wonders whether anyone will punish Longenecker. She fears he will harm others if someone doesn't discipline him. "He has issues he needs to deal with before he treats patients who have psychiatric diseases," said Spell, 45, who agreed to let the News & Record publish her name.

Longenecker's attorney said last week that he will try to appeal the jury's verdict, even though the deadline for filing an appeal passed in September. Randy James of Winston-Salem said he will ask the N.C. Court of Appeals for a provisional appeal because Longenecker's previous lawyer let the deadline pass. James said Longenecker strongly denies Spell's claims. "She has a history of (medical) issues herself," James said. "There's nothing else in his background to suggest these allegations are true."

The jury ruled unanimously that Spell was entitled to $60,000 for sexual exploitation, $16,000 for personal injury and $100,000 in punitive damages. The jury agreed, however, that she didn't suffer severe emotional distress. Spell has seen none of the money. Longenecker's malpractice insurer, the Chicago Insurance Company, says it isn't responsible for the verdict because his policy doesn't cover sexual abuse.

If the insurance company doesn't pay, Lile-King said she will try to collect the money from Longenecker.

Spell and Lile-King say no one representing the board has contacted them. Neither woman is satisfied that the board has taken the complaint seriously or that the board has properly investigated the original complaint, filed in 2000. The board closed the case without taking action. Spell insists she never was interviewed by investigators.

Despite Spell's frustrations that no one has punished Longenecker, she said she's the healthiest and happiest she has been in years. She's working as a pharmacy clerk in a drug store, and though she has maintained her nursing license, she's taking a refresher course to catch up on medical developments in the 12 years since she practiced.

County mental health department further in the red

After cutting 45 jobs and setting up a special fund to deal with a $1.7 million deficit last year, the Mendocino County Mental Health Department is reporting that it will likely be almost $1 million further in the red this year. Mental Health Director Beth Martinez will ask the county supervisors to allow her to make more cuts in the department right away.

Infighting in the Field of Psychiatry

They have been called assassins and parasites. They receive hate mail from the proponents of a variety of popular psychotherapies. The president-elect of the American Psychological Association has accused them of being overly devoted to the scientific method. But the ire of their colleagues has not prevented a small, loosely organized band of academic psychologists from rooting out and publicly debunking mental health practices that they view as faddish, unproved or in some cases potentially harmful.

In 1988, a group of researchers, concerned that the American Psychological Association, the dominant professional organization, was not placing enough emphasis on science, split off and formed the American Psychological Society. The society now counts close to 15,000 members.

"These guys are sort of the Ralph Naders of psychology," said Dr. David Barlow, director of the Center for Anxiety and Related Disorders at Boston University.

Dr. Richard McNally, a professor of psychology at Harvard who has conducted research on repressed memories, E.M.D.R. and other problems, said he had received threatening letters, e-mail messages and telephone calls from angry practitioners.

Read the full article from the New York Times.

Psychiatric Survivor to Receive Prestigious Disability Leadership Award

The American Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD) is pleased to announce that international human rights lawyer and disability rights advocate Alison Ashley Hillman will receive a prestigious 2003 Paul G. Hearne/AAPD Leadership Award for emerging leaders with disabilities. The award presentation, which includes a $10,000 cash award, will take place at AAPD's Third-Annual Leadership Gala on March 16, 2004, at the Washington Hilton in Washington, DC. Secretary of Commerce Don Evans and Transportation Secretary Norman Y. Mineta will deliver keynote remarks, and a host of Congressional leadership will also be part of the program.

After receiving her bachelor's degree with distinction from Cornell University, Alison Ashley Hillman was handcuffed and taken to the psychiatric ward of her local hospital. She was eventually diagnosed with bipolar disorder and rotated in and out of a locked ward for five months. Allison faced bankruptcy and was on food stamps, Medicare and SSI -- she also was forced to abandon her dream of becoming an international human rights lawyer. For two more years, she struggled and experienced first-hand the vast barriers that people with psychiatric disabilities face, including obstacles in finding employment, accessing healthcare and suffering debilitating stigma and discrimination.

Allison struggled, but survived. She also received her law degree cum laude from American University's Washington College of Law in 2002, and fulfilled her dream of becoming an international human rights lawyer. After graduation, she was awarded a New Voices Fellowship to work with Mental Disability Rights International (MDRI). New Voices is a national leadership development program that helps nonprofit organizations recruit creative and diverse "new voices" in the field.

Through this fellowship, Alison now manages MDRI's Americas Advocacy Initiative, where she works for the international recognition and enforcement of the rights of people with mental disabilities. In this capacity, she confronts and addresses the very barriers she experienced.

Allison hopes that the groundbreaking cases she is currently working on will establish legal precedent in the Inter-American system that recognizes and enforces the rights of people with mental disabilities, and also help illustrate that community alternatives are needed for people with mental disabilities and effortless detention in psychiatric facilities is inappropriate.

Alison's goals are to empower consumer-driven support and advocacy organizations through workshops in advocacy, human rights of people with mental disabilities, documentation of human rights violations, and the establishment of a small grants program for consumer-run advocacy organizations. Ultimately, she hopes to end the institutionalization of people with mental disabilities and aims to establish their right to appropriate treatment in the community.

Oregon doctor's license suspended for signing marijuana cards

A doctor who signed nearly half of all the medical marijuana cards in Oregon was suspended from practicing medicine on Thursday.

Dr. Phillip Leveque, 81, said Thursday he has signed more than 4,000 cards for people with crippling disorders who want to smoke pot to alleviate their pain. He had two offices in Portland and traveled frequently along Interstate 5 to mass meetings in hotel conference rooms with patients seeking the card.

By the time of his suspension Thursday, Leveque had authorized roughly 40 percent of all the cards issued in Oregon since the state became one of nine in the country legalizing pot for medicine in 1998. Leveque was under scrutiny since 2002, when the Oregon Board of Medical Examiners suspended his license for 90 days and fined him $5,000 for signing cards without first seeing patients face-to-face. Sometimes, he reviewed descriptions of patients ailments sent by fax.

Several Oregon physicians hired by the board as consultants raised concerns about Leveque's practices, according to board executive director Kathleen Haley. They found he approved cards for patients with psychiatric disorders and prior histories of drug addition for whom marijuana was not appropriate, and recommended smoking pot for conditions that could in no way benefit from the drug, Haley said.

Psychiatrist's Husband molested Wife's patients

The husband of a Trumbull, Conn. psychiatrist has admitted impersonating a doctor to molest his wife's patients, and now faces five years in prison. Barry Lichenthal, 59, plead guilty earlier this week to fourth-degree sexual assault, practicing medicine without a license, and reckless endangerment. Police say Lichenthal worked under the name of Doctor Michael Taylor at his wife's Bridgeport drug clinic, the Noah's Ark Foundation. He will be sentenced March 26.

Anti-depressants 'cause bleeding'

Elderly people and those with a history of bleeding disorders have been warned of the risk of taking certain types of anti-depressants. Experts say a group of anti-depressants called selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors or SSRIs may predispose some people to internal bleeding.

Writing in the Drug and Therapeutic Bulletin, they said the drugs should not be given to 'at risk' groups. Britain's Department of Health has said clearer warnings were being considered.

See the full report in this BBC News item

Johns Hopkins University settles Lawsuit for overbilling pychiatric research

The Johns Hopkins University and one of its teaching hospitals have agreed to pay more than $2.6 million to settle a federal lawsuit alleging that they overbilled the National Institutes of Health for addiction research and other projects.

The settlement, announced yesterday by the U.S. attorney's office, came six years after an employee told federal authorities that researchers at Hopkins Bayview Medical Center had inflated the amount of time required to carry out studies on therapies for drug dependence.

"The United States must maintain the integrity of the grant application and funding process for research," U.S. Attorney Thomas M. DiBiagio said in a prepared statement. The university and Bayview agreed to pay $2.1 million in addition to $587,000 already refunded, but they did not admit any wrongdoing.

Drug Makers Face an angry Public

Pharmaceutical companies would be sufficiently challenged just dealing with the many internal pressures facing them today. Plagued by patent expirations on key drugs and late-stage disappointments for products in the development pipeline, major drugmakers are struggling to deliver the kind of earnings growth that was typical in the 1990s.

But at the same time, they are being buffeted by a number of external pressures on the public, political, and regulatory fronts. Taken together, these strains are increasing costs, holding down pricing, and creating additional barriers to profitability. Under growing pressure from patient groups and public officials, U.S. pharmaceutical producers must invent new ways to address these antagonistic outside forces.

Many of these problems stem from the public's deteriorating opinion of big drug companies.

Meaning that folks aren't trusting them like they used to. I wonder why?

New Jersey Superior Court OKs Psychiatrist's License Revocation

A panel of state Superior Court judges ruled that the license of accused sexual predator and Princeton-area psychiatrist Dr. Don Henry Wijaya should be revoked. Wijaya had been accused of having sex with a female patient identified only as F.B. from shortly after he began treating the divorced mother of two in 1981 until 1984, and again from July 1993 to August 1994. Wijaya disputed that, but an administrative law judge who heard the case "determined that the charges were supported by credible evidence and recommended revocation" of his license.

The ruling by a three-judge panel in the Superior Court appellate division affirms the decision of the New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners, the body that regulates doctors. The board revoked to Wijaya's license in March 2002, but the appellate division issued a stay allowing Wijaya to continue practicing while his appeal proceeded.

The doctor's lawyer said he will appeal.

Psychiatric patient tells of ordeal in treatment

When Elizabeth Gale sought psychiatric treatment in 1986, she suffered from depression, the most common of psychiatric illnesses.

But Dr. Bennett Braun and his colleagues convinced her that her family indoctrinated her as a child so she would make babies for sacrifice in a satanic cult, Gale charged in a malpractice suit she settled Wednesday for $7.5 million. The therapists, she alleged, told her she needed their help to recover memories hidden beneath layers of rare multiple personalities that she had developed as a psychic guard against her childhood trauma.

Gale's attorney Todd Smith said that under the settlement, entered Wednesday in Cook County Circuit Court, Rush North Shore Medical Center, where Braun was director of the dissociative disorders program, will pay $3.6 million. Psychologist Roberta Sachs will pay $3.1 million, and a corporation affiliated with Braun will pay $500,000. Dr. Corydon Hammond will pay $175,000, and Rush University Medical Center must pay $150,000. No wrongdoing was admitted by the hospitals, the doctors or the psychologist.

In 1997, west suburban resident Patricia Burgus received a $10.5 million settlement in a suit filed against the hospital, then known as Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's, and two therapists, including Braun. Burgus and her sons were hospitalized at Rush in the late 1980s. Braun later sued his insurance company for allegedly settling the case without his consent.

Burgus, under Braun's care, said she came to believe she had more than 300 personalities and had cannibalized children as part of a satanic cult.

Full Details here

Unauthorized state bank account for mental health officials draws ethics scrutiny

Two pharmaceutical companies paid nearly $14,000 into an unauthorized state bank account that was used by state mental health officials for travel, meals and other expenses at a time when the drugmakers were courting state business, records show.

Janssen Pharmaceutica and Pfizer Inc., also paid at least $10,000 to two state officials who helped win approval for a mental-health treatment plan that uses drugs manufactured by the companies, according to interviews and a review of documents from the state Office of Inspector General. Those payments - some of which went to charity and the general state fund - were for speaking engagements and attendance at company meetings.

State and federal officials are examining the connection between the payments and the state's program.

Detailed article. Any appearance of corruption is merely a coincidence. yeh, right.

The Torture of Auckland's Behavioural Management Regime

From the ongoing trial for psychiatric abuse in New Zealand

Prison bosses invented a new "super maximum" security class in a hidden system that avoided normal rules for prisoners, a New Zealand High Court judge has been told.

Nine past and present prisoners say they were subject to psychological torture while being held on the "behavioural management regime" (BMR) at Auckland's Paremoremo prison, or while in solitary confinement.

Lawyer Tony Ellis began closing his case for the prisoners in Wellington yesterday.

During more than a month of evidence, prisoners said they were held in solitary for up to two years without regular review of their classification, or medical assessment, without access to natural light, or the chance to associate with other prisoners.

BMR amounted to a higher than maximum security classification, a kind of "super-maximum", Mr Ellis said.

"It is essentially a security classification that was not approved and was invented by the department."

Psychiatric evidence showed one prisoner developed post traumatic stress disorder within weeks of being put on the programme.

Mr Ellis said alleging torture was one of the most serious allegations it was possible to make, and he was trying to be responsible and not overstate the position.

The system was an experiment in behaviour modification when it began in April 1998, he said. It breached the prisoners' rights not to be subject to scientific or medical experimentation without consent.

More than 50,000 Australian children are being hand-fed antidepressant drugs that have been banned overseas.

More than 50,000 Australian children are being hand-fed antidepressant drugs that have been banned overseas. A British medical authority, The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, told doctors in December not to prescribe the drugs to patients under 18 because they can increase the risk of suicide.

The warning covers five of the six drugs called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

The US Food and Drug Administration has warned doctors to proceed with extreme caution in prescribing any SSRI other than Prozac to children. However, the Australian federal health department has done nothing to warn patients and doctors of the dangers, or moved to ban the five varieties of SSRI.

More than 90 per cent of American Women use prescription medication

New research shows that women could be running unnecessary risks by not fully disclosing to their doctors which medications they use, even when repeatedly prompted.

The study, published Tuesday in the United States, shows that women they examined are heavily medicated, relying on a potpourri of prescription and over-the-counter medications, topped up with herbal supplements.

The researchers said that they were surprised at the rates of medication use they found. Among the 567 women studied, more than 90 per cent used prescription medication and more than half used herbal supplements. A whopping 96.5 per cent used over-the-counter medications, almost two-thirds of them using four or more regularly.

Is the condition of being Female becoming a medical condition?

Antidepressants hazardous to health care coverage

As reported in the San Francisco Chronicle

With nearly 19 million Americans under a diagnosis of depression, antidepressant use is skyrocketing in the United States. The newer antidepressants are the second most commonly prescribed class of drugs in the country, according IMS Health, a firm that tracks the pharmaceutical industry.

However, people with individual insurance are vulnerable to rejection or higher rates due to any number of pre-existing conditions because, unlike group plans, they must answer detailed questions about their medical history to qualify.

Those with pre-existing conditions such as serious heart problems or a history of cancer may not be surprised to be rejected, but millions of Americans taking antidepressants for a variety of reasons -- from anxiety to a bout of minor depression following a divorce or even to smoking cessation -- may be shocked to have that prescription come back to haunt them.

The Insurance Companies remain skeptial of the wisdom of such wide spread prescriptions of such expensive medications, as well they should, and this is back firing of people who have been prescribed the drugs

Hospitals say chief psychiatrist 'out of touch'

Victorian hospital administrators in Australia have publicly accused the state's chief psychiatrist, Amgad Tanaghow, of failing to grasp the extent of the crisis in the mental health system.

The accusations, dating back to October last year, came to light yesterday amid warnings that large numbers of mentally ill patients are committing suicide after receiving inadequate care in the state's hospitals.

Psychoanalysis Is Dead ... So How Does That Make You Feel?

As seen in an article published in the LA Times

We now know that Freud compulsively fudged the historical record. This tendency is evident in Freud's backsliding statements on his advocacy of cocaine, his opportunism concerning the case of Anna O., his flip-flops on the seduction theory, and in almost every instance where he mentions a patient.

Just ask the "Wolf Man," Sergius Pankejeff, whom Freud supposedly cured but who was, in truth, consigned to psychoanalysis for an additional 60 years. Not surprising, Pankejeff considered Freud's effect on his life a "catastrophe."

We also know that Freud never seriously dealt with the problem of "suggestion," which totally compromised his clinical findings and, by extension, his theories. Already, by the 1890s, few believed in Freud's convenient claim that suggestion — the undue influence of the psychoanalyst over the patient — was possible only in the biologically predisposed and was thus of no consequence to his findings. Amazingly, these critical insights were buried under Freud's rhetoric of denial and by his growing fame. Now we've come full circle.

Austin Psychiatrist On Trial For Sexual Assault

An Austin psychiatrist is on trial for sexually assaulting seven of his male patients. Doctor Gregory Vagshenian is charged with seven counts of sexual assault.

Assistant District Attorney Joe Maida argues Vagshenian, a psychiatrist, was performing physical exams, which turned out to be sexual acts on a number of men at a South Austin Veterans Affair Outpatient Clinic said. A former patient says the doctor sexually exploited him on this table. But he did tell somebody: an Austin police detective and an Austin attorney. Defense argues what he told the police only proves that this is all about money.

It's a crime many of Vagshenian's patients says happened to them, but they felt powerless against the doctor, and many prosecutors say had the power to send them to the psychiatric ward.

A video report is currently available

Legislator claims Mental Illness cased his ethical lapses

A 23-year-old New Hampshire state representative facing possible expulsion from the Legislature says he will sue to stop ethics proceedings against him. Bedford Rep. John Kerns failed to show up at a hearing Monday on three ethics charges against him: passing a bad check with “State of New Hampshire” written on it; using his title to get a parking spot reserved for school officials; and threatening them when told to stop parking there. He also faces four criminal charges of passing bad checks.

Kerns claims he has a medical condition that caused his behavior.

Kerns said private e-mails he sent to the chairman of the committee, state Rep. Shawn Jasper, R-Hudson, were improperly disclosed. The ethics committee’s own rules say its proceedings must be suspended if certain violations of confidentiality have occurred, he said.

Jasper recommended that Kerns be expelled from the Legislature. If he is, it would be the first expulsion of a state lawmaker since 1913. The committee meets again next week to resume its debate.

“He claims to have a mental illness. Before that it was a physical illness,” Jasper said. “He won’t tell anyone what it is. He led people to believe at one point he was diabetic.”

Woman participating in Lilly trial hangs self

A toxicology test will determine whether narcotics played a role in the suicide of a 19-year-old woman who was participating in clinical trials for a new drug that Eli Lilly and Co. hopes to launch this year. Traci Johnson, Bensalem, Pa., hanged herself Saturday night in the Lilly Laboratory for Clinical Research by tying a scarf to a bathroom shower rod, according to the Indianapolis Police Department.

While the toxicology test is standard procedure in the investigation of suicides by the Marion County coroner, it could have huge implications for Lilly if it is determined that the trial drug -- or removal from it -- played a role in the woman's suicide. Lilly said Monday it does not believe the drug, duloxetine, was related to the death of Johnson, who was a former student at Indiana Bible College. Toxicology test results are expected in about a month.

Duloxetine is key to future business prospects of Lilly. It is the main ingredient in Cymbalta, an anti-depressant drug, and in a stress urinary incontinence treatment, both of which are moving toward final approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, incidents such as the suicide of a clinical trial participant often draw questions from the FDA and can delay the federal approval needed to bring a drug to market.

In earlier statements, Lilly has said it expects the FDA to approve duloxetine to treat both depression and incontinence in 2004. Analysts have predicted sales of each could near $200 million this year. They bill Cymbalta as a potential blockbuster that could top $2 billion in sales by 2008.

Lilly spokesman Rob Smith would not say which use of the drug was the subject of Johnson's trials. However, the trial cycled the participants between doses of duloxetine and a placebo. At the time of her death, Smith said, Johnson was taking placebo.

Lilly Claims that "there's nothing to suggest that this is anything but an isolated incident."

right. Much more to the story at the link